tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post9146240409082680381..comments2008-03-19T09:44:47.194-04:00jim benderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09759712228101061968noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-48354720010626787952008-03-19T09:44:00.000-04:002008-03-19T09:44:00.000-04:00Yeah, integrity in the process.....barf.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-28483820591121015062008-03-17T16:18:00.000-04:002008-03-17T16:18:00.000-04:00Since the whole thing was electronic there was really only one vote counter. The Clerk is responsible for the tabulation and the integrity of the process.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-82378624825175319262008-03-17T16:07:00.000-04:002008-03-17T16:07:00.000-04:00I know the O.P.P. were ready to seize the ballot boxes if the court order was processed but the candidate involved let it go. He was,is and always will be a fraud. Word is one "vote counter" in the know is getting nervous about the growing whisper campaign. There may be light at the end of the tunnel after all.....In other words anything to gas this prick would work for me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-32685446814391450952008-03-17T07:04:00.000-04:002008-03-17T07:04:00.000-04:00There were questions raised as to who was present and who was not allowed to be present during the final tabulation. It's my understanding that certain candidates were excluded while other preferred candidates were allowed to be present.<BR/><BR/>It would be interesting if anyone who was there could confirm this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-74463213204394052962008-03-17T06:55:00.000-04:002008-03-17T06:55:00.000-04:00Exactly. all that matters is who counted the votes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-76972837085488108932008-03-17T04:36:00.000-04:002008-03-17T04:36:00.000-04:00"It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people who count the votes." (Josef Stalin)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-13506540545397696292008-03-17T00:39:00.000-04:002008-03-17T00:39:00.000-04:00He only shoots his mouth off when he is pissed. \otherwise his handlers,Nelson albeit, have him shut the uck up as to not shoot himself in the foot,as you see...AGAIN.....He scammed the election from Nads....I wanna recount...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-55954681880184026852008-03-15T09:19:00.000-04:002008-03-15T09:19:00.000-04:00Calling him? You're joking?<BR/><BR/>He's been called. He's been petitioned for Christ's sake. <BR/><BR/>He doesn't discuss. He dictates. After all, he's The leader.<BR/><BR/><BR/>"What are we going to do tonight Michael?"<BR/><BR/>"What we do every night, Pinkey. We're going to take over the world."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-40295917653991493682008-03-15T08:36:00.000-04:002008-03-15T08:36:00.000-04:00Maybe instead of giving him such a hard time always you could consider calling him and discussing some matters with him if you feel that inclined to complain.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-71679013865767520882008-03-15T06:49:00.000-04:002008-03-15T06:49:00.000-04:00The fundamental problem is the idea that the people we elect to council are elected to lead. Does anyone really believe that any of these people are qualified to lead anyone anywhere? <BR/><BR/>Really. Look at them. Is there anyone sitting on council that you would trust to manage your finances or counsel you on personal decisions. These people are not special. None of them have any particularly impressive credentials. Some of them have no credentials at all other than their vote tally. A couple of them are dumb as posts and one is crazy as a shithouse rat. Leaders? Please.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-81087820124764639972008-03-15T04:01:00.000-04:002008-03-15T04:01:00.000-04:00"How many "leaders" would push his council into voting against the people?"<BR/><BR/>Most of them. Harper and McGuinty come immediately to mind. :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-12444909571939448382008-03-14T15:52:00.000-04:002008-03-14T15:52:00.000-04:00lmao...Harding is a dolt!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-56241620443566942802008-03-14T14:59:00.000-04:002008-03-14T14:59:00.000-04:00amenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-79767455963292034072008-03-14T07:28:00.000-04:002008-03-14T07:28:00.000-04:00"a strong subtext of anti-leadership in Woodstock".<BR/><BR/>If by that he means that the people of Woodstock would prefer a more democratic approach by the Mayor and Council then I would have to agree.<BR/><BR/>The statement would indicate that Mr Harding has a vision of himself as a "leader." Excuse me if I take a brief recess to laugh myself silly. The only thing this joker is qualified to lead is a herd of lemmings. The sooner he finds a cliff the better off we'll all be.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13769431.post-21378225512121021422008-03-14T07:19:00.000-04:002008-03-14T07:19:00.000-04:00This only means that you must be driving the bugger nutsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com