BENDERS NEWS FLASH

Loading...

31 August 2007

What Happened to the Statement"Pigs At The Trough"


THE HARPER IN OPPOSITION IS NOT THE SAME AS THE HARPER IN THE PRIME MINISTERS' OFFICE.
(I love bacon!)

And here's that same old line again.

These guys will say ANYTHING to get elected.

While in opposition Stephen Harper made hundreds of claims that the government was feeding at the trough. He whined and complained about "patronage" appointments. He told us the government of the day was corrupt and not being honest in its' appointments.

Well...I believed him and so did many other Canadians.(at the time that is)

Now it's a couple of years later, and we have Stephen Harper sitting in the PMO and now we are being subjected to pork barrell announcements....like the appointment of Pat Binns(who was severely trounced at the polls indicating that people just didn't believe in his policies anymore in his home province) yesterday to the post of Canada's ambassador to Ireland...something that in the past was referred to as a "plum" post.

In 1998 Conservative MP Rob Anders criticized the nomination of Ron Irwin at the time, saying the only criterion was being a "friend and loyalist" of then-prime-minister Jean Chrétien.

Now it seems the only prerequisite for getting a plum post...is to be a card carrying conservative party member, or a failed conservative politician.

Harper has made nearly 2000 patronage appointments since his election to the prime ministers' office in 2006.

30 August 2007

So, what has happened to the Global Warming Parade?

Nice Weather Tends To Make People Forget
It would appear as though many of Ontarios' parties have forgotten about the issue of global warming, pollution and the environment.
One of the most pressing concerns we have in Ontario is that of water quality and the growing mountain of garbage that we citizens of this province produce on a daily basis. On a worldwide level, global warming is an issue that all provinces need to look at.
Ontario at present is suffering from a shortage of landfill sites. Perhaps instead of building new landfills, we should be looking at having manufacturers reduce the amount of packaging that is used to wrap merchandise.
Some things are ridiculous when we look at them.
Toys: Kids toys are routinely wrapped in several layers of protection. 1/ The cardboard box that is the focus of attention when you spy a new toy in a shop. It carries an attractive message like"Mattel" or "Fischer- Price". Inside of the box you will find a cheap toy surrounded by clear plastic, bubble-shrink wrapped for your safety.
After removing the toy from it's box, and plastic wrap, you will discover the need for a philips screwdriver to remove the 4 screws in the bottom of the toy that keep it "fixed" tightly to the box base. Then you will need a wire cutters to cut the wire that is wrapped around the axle of your toy firetruck. After half an hour of extensive physical labour and a pile of frustration you are ready to present your kid with his new lead coated chinese slave labour made fire truck...from Mattel, or Fischer-Price.
Your kids are totally ecstatic, and you are disgusted.
Now you have 4 screws, some wire, a cardboard box, and a bunch of clear plastic to dispose of. All straight to the landfill. And if that box is painted with lead based paint...it will end up in your water supply in say 25 years from now after it breaks down.
Eliminating some of the packaging on items such as this would go a huge way towards reducing the amount of garbage headed to the landfill. Asking manufacturers to play some part in this reduction is a great idea...and it doesn't take a tax break to get it done...just a government with a backbone and the will to see it happen.

Here's a great petition...Sign It!

Change Name of Canada's NEW Government
To: THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA
WHEREAS the Government of Canada was formed by an act of the British Parliament in 1867 and, therefore, the Government of Canada is one hundred and forty years old; AND WHEREAS the Conservative Party of Canada was elected to form the Government of Canada on January 23, 2006 and did form the Government of Canada on February 6, 2006; AND WHEREAS, immediately upon forming the Government of Canada, the Conservative Party of Canada commenced referring to the Government of Canada and itself, interchangeably, as "Canada's New Government" on official government documents, press releases, websites, and so on; AND WHEREAS it has been almost one year and one half year since the Conservative Party of Canada formed the Government of Canada, and yet the Conservative Party of Canada continues to insist upon referring to itself as "Canada's New Government"; AND WHEREAS the definition of new (nû, nyû) adj. includes: 1. Having been made or come into being only a short time ago; recent: a new law. 2. Still fresh: a new coat of paint. 3. Never used or worn before now: a new car; a new hat. 4. Just found, discovered, or learned; AND WHEREAS, due to all of the foregoing reasons and to basic common everyday sense and common understanding of the meaning of the word "new", it is petty, partisan, asinine, childish, juvenile and silly (not to mention completely embarrassing for all of us) for the Conservative Party of Canada to continue referring to the Government of Canada and to itself, interchangeably, as "Canada's New Government"; NOW THEREFORE, we the undersigned petitioners, in good faith and passionate patriotic fervour, and with all the due respect the Conservative Party of Canada so richly deserves, do humbly demand that the Conservative Party of Canada: 1) immediately cease referring to itself as "Canada's New Government"; 2) immedieatly cease referring to the Government of Canada as "Canada's New Government"; and 2) immediately commence referring to itself as "Canada's New-ish-like Government."
Sincerely,
The Undersigned

What is the point of an election, when all you get in return is the status quo?

ELECTION JUST A MINOR GLITCH TO THOSE IN POWER
Every now and then we all wake up on the wrong side of the bed. Today is my turn.
Ontario is moving slowly towards its' date with democracy, if that's what we can call it.
After this election we will see no real change in policy or direction of the government. The priorities of the parties do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the populace, many who refuse to vote based on past party transgressions. The party elected to lead the people will only be governing a small portion of the people, and this does not include the bureaucracy even though a small number of those bureaucrats may have voted in favour of that party. As a result, this leaves many people wondering what is the point of voting, when your vote is lost to the bureaucracy?
Electing a new party will not elect a new system. The same stale policies will flourish...no matter who we elect. The opportunity for greater change is lost in the bureaucratic paper shuffle. These people have no responsibility to the population, and to the population they remain nameless and faceless in totality. In many instances the bureaucracy can be seen pushing around the elected parties. In many cases, the bureaucrats control the elected member.
Perhaps it is time that we elected our main civil servants instead of giving them lifetime jobs in the service.
Whatever the case, there is very little point in voting as long as you can expect the same mistreatment from all parties alike. Some people will say if you do not vote you do not have a right to complain. I think, we vote, and although we have the right to speak out,we still are not heard by the people who have been elected to listen to us and represent us.
Until we have the right of recall, we have nothing at all.

29 August 2007

What are the priorities of Ontario in this election?

SWIMMING THROUGH THE MUD AND DEBRIS, IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE WHAT IS GOING ON.
Almost everyday now we read about some new announcement, or some initiative that the government is taking, or promising us all in the name of re-election. There are new policing and security announcments, environmental initiatives(now we are going to plant 50 million treees), educational funding.(12 million for autism)and todays promise of $700 million for home care in Ontario.
The opposition parties as well have jumped on the band wagon with their own broad sweeping program changes, reductions and increases and subsidies to corporations.
(the NDP promise to cut hydro rates to businesses in the manufacturing sector)(thereby insinuating that only manufacturers are the only ones worthy of a break in high rates)
And behind the scenes, the political name calling rages on like the Greek forest fires.
John Torys' promise not to become involved in mud slinging at the onset of his leadership...but now woefully tossing some mighty large pies everywhere, and anywhere may cost him in some peoples' eyes. McGuinty's promise to install pollution scrubbers on coal fired electricity generating plants and then walking away from that plan, as well as his promise to fund autism therapy, but then refused to do so leaves nothing but a sour taste in many mouths as well.
And Howard Hampton? He's heading a party that prefers to see itself as an "influence"party, and not one prepared to govern any time soon.

27 August 2007

Elections and....bullshit.

A morning rant on Ontarios' upcoming election
In the next six weeks we will see a flurry of election promises as we have never seen before. These political parties will each weigh into the fray with billions in announcements; tax cuts, new programs,infrastructure plans, green plans, educational plans,more tax breaks, hydro rate reductions for businesses, and they will all promise to do better than the last guy that sat in the legislature, without spending another nickle of our money.
Well, frankly, I can barely contain myself when I hear the pile of promises made in such odious manner knowing full well that our Elections Act is flawed beyond comprehension, and the fact that none of these people who are on their way to being re-elected, or elected, are really in any shape or fashion, accountable to us, the people.
Ontario is presenting on the ballott this year, the opportunity for people to become engaged, and the tools for people to change the present first past the post system in Ontario. This is a small step towards democracy and a more proportional vote. Sadly, they have decided against the right to recall, so in effect, the mechanisms of the system will change very little on the inside, but will appear to have changed on the outside. Without the right of recall or a similar mechanism to ensure the elected official "listens" to the people(his constituents), we are really gaining very little in terms of accountable officials. Ontarians should be steaming angry about this one.These major parties have found a way to "dupe" us into believing they are changing, when in fact, they are not.
I will cast a vote for the new system as it is a small beginning, and much better than the "crap" we are experiencing at present, but only with small consolation will I cast my vote, hoping that this is truly a new beginning for Ontario and democracy.
Every small step is something at least. We are like dogs begging for crumbs, or so they think.
I will remember in the back of my mind the fact that these candidates all make promises, are not obligated to keep them, and have a tendency to say things they do not mean in an effort to gain the first prize. They will say anything...just anything to get you to side with them, and to cast a vote in their direction.
I will contact all of them, ask questions, and hope for an answer. Some of them will choose not to answer. Some of them have already done so. I will not be voting for them...guaranteed.
I suggest people go to the election websites of all the parties running, submit emails asking questions and if that doesn't work, (it appears many of them are technologically unable to read emails) call them or visit their campaign offices. If they see no one come in their doors, they will assume that the status quo is good, and they should continue governing in the same despicable manner.
The parties will attempt to divert attention from the real issues by creating "priorities" which usually are not in tune with what we the people are looking for. We the citizens should pressure these people to adopt the priorities that are important to us.The priorities of people...not parties.
We as electors have an obligation to voice our concerns, and we as electors have the right to demand an answer to our questions. Whether or not these candidates see fit to answer us is another question, and if that is the case, then voting for them would be foolhardy.
Otherwise folks, get ready for the season of lies, betrayal and drama. There's going to be lots of it. In fact, it's already started. We've heard billions of dollars being tossed around like footballs.
And its' much better than a season of the Sopranos..but not much different.
jim bender

A few things that I won't be doing

AFTER READING THE NEWS...I'VE DECIDED NOT TO TRY THESE FEW THINGS

I have decided that I will not be attending any garden parties...after reading this one...
One woman was killed and another was rushed to hospital with life-threatening injuries after a tree crashed down on a garden party attended by several people in east Toronto last night.
Emergency crews were called to a house on Ledge Rd., near the intersection of McCowan and Kingston Rds., around 9:15 p.m., said Duty Officer Connie Christie with Toronto Emergency Medical Services.
Police do not know why a willow tree fell down on the party, trapping two women.
One woman, 65, was pronounced dead at the scene, while another, 78, was freed and rushed to Sunnybrook hospital with severe injuries to her head, back and chest. Two men were taken to a Scarborough hospital with minor injuries.
"It's just tragic," said Sgt. Peter Laufer, after speaking to a daughter of one of the victims, who appeared too distraught to talk.
Neighbour Shirley Stephan said the noise "sounded like a clanging."
"I was in the house, that's how loud it was."
The area has been noisy with construction and Stephan assumed the sound was a just a consequence of the repairs going on.
David Merritt, who also lives nearby, believes recent severe weather may have weakened some neighbourhood trees.
Merritt said the tree that fell had appeared to have been dead for some time.
Now will I be doing any balloon rides anytime soon...
A pilot with the ballooning company involved in a fatal accident in Surrey, B.C., says its operations have been suspended pending the outcome of an investigation into the incident.
John Kageorge says the probe needs to determine how a fire broke out in the balloon's gondola.
Two people were killed Friday when a sunset balloon ride turned into a disaster. Another 11 people were hurt when they were forced to jump from the flaming balloon.
Kageorge says the pilot remains very shaken by the incident.
The flaming balloon crashed on an RV park, destroying several of the camper vehicles.
Witnesses watched in horror as the balloon burst into flames and plummeted to the ground in suburban Surrey, unleashing an inferno of exploding propane tanks.
Three of the injured remain in a New Westminster hospital and one was transferred to Vancouver General's burn unit.
A typical ride begins with passengers helping to fill the balloon, or envelope, using huge fans to drive air in. Then, the air is heated with propane heaters, which will be used later in the trip to keep it aloft.
"Hot-air balloons do not contain a big bag of gas over the heads of passengers," said Kageorge, a veteran balloon pilot. "There's nothing but air there. We heat it and that's what allows the balloon to lift."
Below the envelope hangs the basket. In the case of the balloon that went down in B.C., the basket had five compartments with a pilot's cockpit in the middle.
The propane tanks for heating the air during the flight are also in the cockpit, Kageorge said.
Both the balloon pilot and the balloon must be licensed by the federal government.
Transport Canada spokesperson Rod Nelson said the Transportation Safety Board and B.C.'s provincial coroner may make recommendations to Transport Canada, but he said balloon accidents of this magnitude are very rare.
"I don't recall in the 28 years I've worked for Transport Canada a balloon crash with fatalities like this, at least in B.C.," Nelson said.
Friday's tragedy comes two weeks after a hot-air balloon carrying a dozen passengers crash-landed in a farmer's field north of Winnipeg, badly burning two people.
And holy...don't get married!
They had come from all over North America for the wedding and as the large extended family of the Sikh bride and groom celebrated, the banging of drums echoed across the dark farmland along Lefeuvre Road, in Abbotsford.
The screams would come later, and then the wails of ambulances and the thud of helicopters would shatter the quiet rural atmosphere as the flashing lights of police cars illuminated the scene of one of the worst traffic accidents in British Columbia's history.
In its wake, in a sad and determined affirmation of life yesterday, the wedding went ahead as planned, as the close-knit Indo-Canadian community in Abbotsford struggled to balance the joy of a marriage against the grief of a shocking tragedy.
At 11 p.m. Friday it was all happiness as about 30 friends and family of the bride, Harsimran Mahil, and the groom, Jarnail Grewal, went walking house to house, beating drums, ringing bells and singing traditional songs in a ceremony, known as a jaggo, that was meant to literally wake people up and get them to join the celebrations.
Family and friends share a moment Sunday outside the Sikh temple in Mission, B.C., after the wedding of Harsimran Mahil and Jarnail Grewal. (Rafal Gerszak For The Globe And Mail)

At about the same time a 71-year-old Indo-Canadian man from Langley, whose identity has not yet been released by police, stopped at a local gas station to fuel up his white, 1981 Chevy pickup, with two black stripes on the hood. He was on his way home from working late at a plant in Abbotsford and after he pulled away from the pumps he went south on Lefeuvre Road, unaware that up ahead, just over the crest of a small hill, the wedding celebrants had spilled out into the night and onto the pavement.
Lefeuvre Road, a secondary truck route through rural Abbotsford with a speed limit of 60 kilometres an hour, is lined by trees, blueberry fields and sheep paddocks. The darkness along it is broken only here and there by pools of yellow light from a scattering of farm houses, most set well back from the two-lane road.
The wedding celebrants had just left one house and had begun walking south, back to the home of Avtar Mahil, the father of the bride, where party tents were set out in the expansive yard, when the truck came up behind them.
The group, which did not include the bride and groom, was walking along the right side of the road and although one witness said some were in a sloping ditch that runs parallel to the pavement, others were on the narrow gravel shoulder and some were on the road, in the path of the oncoming truck.
Suddenly headlights pierced the darkness and then the truck, driven by an elderly man with a long, white beard, went smashing into the procession, sending people flying off the hood and dragging several of them with the undercarriage into the ditch, killing six and injuring 17, including two babies.
Three men and three women ranging from 13 to 50 died.
Five of the victims have been identified by Harjinder Thind, the news director for Red 93.1FM, a Punjabi radio station, as Damanpreet Singh Kang, 13, Rubal Kaur, 22, Bhupinder Singh Kaler, 24, Rapduman Singh Dhillan, 25 and Satinder Kaur Mahil, 50. A sixth victim has not yet been identified. Mr. Thind said he talked briefly with the driver of the truck, but "he was too shook up to say much."
The wedding procession began at Avtar Mahil's house and proceeded to the house of Shamsher Mahil, a friend of Mr. Mahil's who grew up in the same Indian village that he did. After about 30 minutes, the procession left to return to Avtar Mahil's house when the accident occurred.
Abbotsford City Councillor Moe Gill, who arrived at Mr. Mahil's house Saturday morning, said he has known the bride's family for 25 years.
He said one of the deceased women was the bride's aunt, Satinder Mahil, who had been at his house for a party just two weeks ago.
"They're in shock. Their mother was just killed last night," he said about Ms. Mahil's three grown children. "It wasn't good when you go in there ... The emotion was out of control."
Avtar Dosanjh, who also arrived on Lefeuvre Road Saturday morning to pay his respects, said he also knew Ms. Mahil.
"She was very, very nice. This whole thing is just really, very sad."Police said 14 area ambulances and two Medevac helicopters from Vancouver Airport were called to transport the injured and seven area hospitals were put on a Code Orange alert, clearing ER space to handle the victims.
According to Sergeant Amar Kingra, of the Abbotsford Police, nine people remained in hospital yesterday, with two in intensive-care units. A four-month-old was released, but a seven-month-old remains in critical but stable condition.
Several of the victims were from the United States and two were from Toronto.
The 71-year-old truck driver was released from police custody after several hours of questioning. Sgt. Kingra said he has been extremely co-operative. Drugs and alcohol have been ruled out as factors, and Sgt. Kingra said there is currently no indication that speed or weather conditions played any role, either.
Constable Casey Vinet suggested the driver may have fallen asleep at the wheel, but that has not been confirmed.
"At this time, there's no charges being proposed or considered until we get our full, complete investigation done including mechanical inspection on the vehicle to find out what went wrong there," he said.
Sgt. Kingra said the police will be interviewing the surviving members of the accident after they have had time to grieve.
Most of the people on the road were women and children who are related to the bride.
Darren Franson and his wife Ester, who live in a house just at the crest of the hill, were watching television at 11:15 p.m. when they heard a "horrendous sound," out on the road. They knew it was a vehicle striking something - but they never imagined it had run into a wall of people.
Moments later their 11-year-old daughter, Rachel, bolted into the living room to tell them the truck had hit the wedding procession.
"She was standing at her bedroom window watching the parade go by when the truck just came up and went plowing right into them ... people just went flying," he said.
"After that it was chaos," he said. "The screaming was unbelievable."
Mr. Franson said a large crowd of people went running to the scene from the house that the procession had just left, and soon there were more than 100 people on the road.
"There were a lot of people there helping, doing what they could, but the screaming went on until the ambulances arrived," he said. "It's hard to describe."
Jaskaran Mahil, who is in Grade 6, told The Canadian Press that he was at the front of the procession with his parents when the truck hit.
"People started yelling and I ran," he said. "Two seconds, probably later, the truck was [there] and I was unconscious."
Yesterday a cluster of half a dozen bundles of flowers marked the accident site, but otherwise it looked just like any other stretch of quiet country road, except for a few tattered pieces of emergency-scene tape in the ditch.

26 August 2007

A Comparison of Platforms As Stated By The Big Three

HOW MANY OF THESE PROMISES CAN WE EXPECT THEM TO KEEP?
There sure seem to be a lot of promises...and not that much money. One thing is that many of these promises were made in the past and simply not kept.
It seems almost miserable to have to choose between having your balls slammed in a door, or having them sliced with a tin can lid.
CONservative Promises
POLICY UPDATESREVIVE NATURAL RESOURCESAug 2, 2007 – A PC Government will reverse years of McGuinty Liberal neglect and restore necessary funds to the Ministry of Natural Resources Fish and Wildlife Program.[more]

POLICY UPDATESIMPROVING E-HEALTHJul 31, 2007 – John Tory says Ontario should use technology to improve patient care in Ontario and better manage health care costs with an improved electronic health records system. [more]

POLICY UPDATESINVEST IN EDUCATIONJul 23, 2007 – John Tory says he would appoint the Hon. Bill Davis to head a Public Education Fairness Implementation Commission to ensure Ontario’s public school system is more inclusive of faith-based schools.[more]

POLICY UPDATESINVEST GAS TAXJul 9, 2007 – John Tory says a PC government will reduce gridlock by investing every penny of the gas tax into improving roads and transit in Ontario.[more]

POLICY UPDATESFIX DOCTOR SHORTAGEJul 6, 2007 – John Tory said a PC Government will take real action and deliver solutions for the many Ontarians without a doctor. This includes increasing the number of doctors in the province and introducing electronic health records.[more]

POLICY UPDATESACCESS TO PENSIONSJul 5, 2007 – John Tory says a PC Government will unlock pensions for seniors and retirees so they can access and manage their own money as they see fit.[more]

POLICY UPDATESENHANCE ARTS & CULTUREJun 28, 2007 – John Tory announces the PC plan “Ontario’s Arts and Culture - A Time For Action” to enhance arts and culture in order to improve Ontario’s economy and quality of life. [more]

POLICY UPDATESFAIRNESS FOR FARMERSJun 5, 2007 – John Tory says farmers are an integral part of our province and announces that the new PC Party plan for agriculture will see increased financial and organizational support for farmers and their products.[more]

POLICY UPDATESIMPROVING HEALTHCAREMay 24, 2007 – John Tory outlines four key principles in the PC Party plan to improve healthcare and commits to supporting a universally accessible, publicly funded healthcare system in Ontario.[more]

POLICY UPDATESONE LAW FOR ALLMay 4, 2007 – In a new PC Party policy announcement, John Tory announced that under his government no one will be beneath the law, above the law or beyond the law.[more]

POLICY UPDATESREDUCE TOXINSApr 20, 2007 – John Tory announces a made-in-Ontario plan to reduce toxins by working with the federal government and businesses across the Province.[more]

POLICY UPDATESQUALITY LONG-TERM CAREApr 17, 2007 – John Tory commits to providing quality long-term care by announcing a plan to upgrade care spaces, provide better incentives for doctors to work in the field and free front-line care from imposing regulations.[more]

POLICY UPDATESPROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENTApr 16, 2007 – The first goal in the Ontario PC Party Plan for the Environment is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 10 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020 and to form a government that will lead by example.[more]

POLICY UPDATESPROTECTING HOMEOWNERSMar 9, 2007 – The Ontario PC Party plan to protect homeowners from skyrocketing property assessment increases includes a five percent annual cap.[more]

POLICY UPDATESHELPING CHILDREN WITH AUTISMFeb 23, 2007 – John Tory announced a plan to help children with autism by getting families the services they need and clearing waiting lists for treatment.[more]
NDP Promises...
these links will open in another window...i hope.
(i think they forgot to note the decrease in electricity rates to manufacturers...or maybe they just want to forget about that corporate subsidy...)
And....The Liberals Promises...

Success for Students: We are committed to all levels of education. Student success in the early grades is laying the foundation for higher achievements, while excellence in postsecondary education is creating a new generation of leaders, innovators and entrepreneurs that will give Ontario an edge.
Better Health: A solid health care system is crucial and more doctors and nurses in our system means all Ontarians will have better access to health care and healthier lives.
Strong People, Strong Economy: We are focused on strengthening Ontario by building a stronger economy and making new investments that will increase opportunities in our communities.
And of Course...The Green Party
SustainabilityOur activities are sustainable only if they can be continued without diminishing the opportunities and resources available to future generations. We have only one planet to live on, and we must treat it as if we mean to stay here.
Social JusticeWith justice comes liberty, stability and lasting progress. We must act locally and globally to secure basic human rights and build a just society.
Grassroots DemocracyTrue democracy exists when citizens meet as equals to resolve problems and make decisions that are important to their community and nation. Citizens must be encouraged to participate in the environmental, economic and political decisions that affect them.
NonviolenceEvery act of violence delays our progress toward a just society. Anger closes the open mind. Fear precludes constructive change.
DecentralizationThe people most affected by a problem must have the authority to solve it. Distant administrations cannot be responsive. Individuals, cities and municipalities need more freedom to shape their destinies.
Community-Based EconomicsBusinesses must contribute to the communities and nations in which they operate. Our economy must build communities, rather than extract profits from them.
Gender Equality/FeminismThe Green Party supports the belief that a feminist perspective emphasizes cooperation instead of competition and nurturing instead of aggression. This perspective must be applied to the governing of our society.
DiversityWe honour the diversity of life on our planet. Every plant and animal has intrinsic value and the right to exist, independent of human needs. All cultural, sexual and spiritual diversity of the Earth's people has intrinsic value.
Personal and Global ResponsibilityWe must learn to take responsibility for ourselves, our families, our communities and ultimately for our planet. As we learn to be responsible, we will give others the means and incentive to do the same.
Ecological WisdomHuman beings are part of nature, not separate from it. We cannot recklessly endanger whole ecosystems and remain unaffected. When we damage the web of life, we damage ourselves.

25 August 2007

Conservative candidates challenge ruling on ad expenses

FINANCE WRONGDOINGS EQUALS ELECTORAL FRAUD
News reports in the mainstream media have indicated a possibility of election finance fraud after certain conservative members were alleged to have overspent on their election campaigns.
So, if this is the case, why is it that these people are permitted to govern even after obtaining their win through the use of fraudulent means?
Personally I would think that any vote that is won improperly, or by false pretences, should be nullified.
At the least, Elections Canada should be given the tools to prosecute even the most minor violations of election law. And those tools should be utilized without pressure from the PMO not to use them.

Some of the polls on this site recently have been particularly thought provoking. The recent one on health care is a case in point.(AW)

"What do You Prefer? Private or Public Health Care?"
Ten out of seventeen people indicate that they prefer public health care. What's interesting about this is that they have absolutely no idea what private health care is. How can they indicate a preference if they have no idea what one of the choices is?I suspect they think private health care is the current version practised south of the border. That's not "private" health care. That's "American" health care. And even the American system is not truly private. In the U.S. 44.6% of health costs are paid by various levels of government. In Canada that number is 69.9%. They're not private and we're not public. We're just more public than they are.It's not about being public or private. Both systems fail to deliver as promised because the people in charge are politicians. Even the much maligned (deservedly) American HMOs are so politically connected and regulated that they really can't be called private.As long as politicians who use health care as a political tool are in charge, both countries have the same system. "Politicized Medicine." ......and that's why I voted, "Just get me a dr!"

23 August 2007

Police Plants at Montebello Decried

Protesters showed what they say is evidence that police "agents provocateurs" tried to incite violence at the world leaders' summit on Monday.
A YouTube video called Stop SPP Protest, with photographs of phoney protesters being arrested, were offered yesterday as proof that police officers were planted in the crowd.
"I think it's imperative that the Canadian public see what the Security and Prosperity Partnership is really about," said Dave Coles, president of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada.
He called the police and federal government agents "goons".
"This is the face of it, where people can't even ask a question without having to face these kinds of goons." In the video, three men with bandanas over their faces were surrounded by a crowd of protesters. Coles confronts the men, telling them to leave the area where protesters were staging a sit-in.
In the video the crowd closes in on thethree "goons"who then quickly retreated to the line of Quebec riot police, where they say something to the officers. They then walk through the line where they are arrested and led away. Photos taken by a protester show the men lying on the ground being handcuffed. The yellow markings and treads on the bottom of their boots are identical to the officers arresting them.
The union has asked that Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Quebec Premier Jean Charest answer questions about the men.
"We can ensure that the RCMP does not use tactics that would encourage confrontation or incite violence," said RCMP Cpl. Luc Bessette.
Planting undercover police officers in a crowd of demonstrators is common practice.

22 August 2007

After Much Deliberation, I have Decided NOT To Run Provincially.

I'm Better Off Letting The Professional Liars Do Their Jobs...Lying.
After months of consideration I've decided that perhaps running in the Ontario Elections would be a waste of my time. Instead, I will use my time to extract a promise from ALL of the candidates to examine the issue of Autism, and to stand up for parents who are being financially and emotionally devastated by this illness.
I figure that if I can get this promise..from all of them, then the opportunity for someone, anyone to stand up for this will be greater.
Unfortunately at this time the only guy who has agreed to stand up is Ernie Hardeman, our PC member of parliament. I called his office one day , and less than 24 hours later, had an answer from him. Although I cannot agree with many of the CONservatives' policies as they are fundamentally flawed, I will back up whoever takes this challenge up. I could care less about being right, left, tory, liberal or NDP. I do not care who the premier is. I only care about whether or not they approach the job with honesty and transparency..and that they keep their promises.
I have just decided that they all suck....and really the choice is about who lies the best, and who has the best haircut. It's no more about the ability to govern.

One thing I do Know Is that They Will All promise To Be faithful Lovers

ELECTION PROMISES GET THICKER AND THICKER
Yesterday someone posted a comment on here wondering why I am on Liblogs.
Well, I suppose the best answer is this...because I feel more "in tune" with a liberal left slant on politics than I do with a conservative view of politics.
But does this mean that I am willing to endure silly politicking in favour of substance?
No. Like I've said before, it isn't where you sit politically, and just because I am a wee bit left-centrist...doesn't mean that I intend on agreeing with stupid decisions just for the sake of agreeing with the party.
This is why I constantly say....the party system is dead.
So, here's the issue.
In the post by AW yesterday, he made a good point of how our taxes are going to go up if McGuinty "uploads" ODSP and a few other things to the province.
Fact is, the municpality will not reduce taxes on property with this announcement. Chances are, they will continue to raise taxes, and as well, we will be taxed at the provincial level in order to accomodate the new regime in program financing. This is unacceptable. Of course all municipalities will be all happy about this because they will have tons of your money to spend on silly things. Instead of reducing property taxes, they will use the money in a most unaccountable manner.
This is not an announcement...it is bribery with the money we have all worked hard to earn. If we don't accept the bribe, they will just squander the money.
It might be a good time to start a cricket club.

21 August 2007

Using Municpal Tax Dollars As an Election Tool is....

AW...A Contributor
Uploading of provincial assistance programs?
So, Dalton McWeasel is going to reverse the downloading of some Provincial assistance programs. The Province is going to resume paying for the Ontario Drug Benefits program and the Ontario Disability Support program. Mike Harris downloaded the cost of these programs to the municipalities in 1998 and we have been paying for them as part of our municipal taxes since then. Before that we were paying for them as part of our provincial taxes. If we re-elect McWeasel we will be paying for them in our provincial taxes again.Does anyone else smell a scam in the works here?Should we expect to see a reduction in our municipal taxes when this financial burden is removed from the shoulders of our municipal governments? Fat Chance! Theyll hang onto the money and squander it on more vanity programs like the new county building or art gallery or maybe some developer needs a golf course, or ............. Dont look for a tax reduction or improvements in essential services.You can bet that the City and County will be whining and sniveling about how tough it is to keep pace with rising costs come the next budget period. Your municipal taxes will go up ... and so will your provincial taxes.McWeasel is buying votes ... with your municipal tax dollars.

19 August 2007

Ontario Says It Will Boost Funding For Autism

THEY MUST NEED VOTES; WHY ELSE WOULD THEY LIE TO US PARENTS OF AUTISTIC KIDS?
Children and Youth Services Minister Mary Anne Chambers says that the McGuinty government will increase funding to the problem of Autism. I think that they are lying.
Chambers stated yesteray that she would be providing $12 million in additional funds to help treat autistics with IBI therapy, a type of intense behavioural therapy presently used to help kids with autism. She says that this money will provide treatment to 210 kids. That's it?
There are 20,000 kids in Ontario with autism...almost enough for a small city.
Just recently, the McGuinty government spent millions on lawyers and courts to enforce the government position that they DID NOT HAVE TO SPEND THIS MONEY ON AUTISTIC KIDS!.
In Fact, they spent $2.4 million on legal fees against this funding...and now they are spending more...to approve this funding.
So, what has changed in the last 9 months?
An Ontario Election that is on the horizon.
Now every party is rolling out its "autism" platform.
John Tory says they'll provide tax incentives to parents of autistics.
The NDP says they will just flat out pay the bill.(and with what money??)
The Liberals say now that they've changed their minds and are glad to blow some dough.(yeah...out of that hugely suspicious surplus I presume)
As soon as they are elected...or re-elected, they will surely forget those promises...just like the past election where they all made those same promises...and broke them.
If you want something done, don't expect government to do it for you.
I've come to realize that governments and the fools that are elected are really there for job creation...for themselves.

amazingly...Ontario Now Has A Huge Surplus?

SURPRISING EVEN HIS OWN SELF, GREG SORBARA FINDS BILLIONS IN SURPLUS IN ONTARIO
Suddenly Ontario finds itself awash with money.Unfortunately Mr Sorbara has forgotten where that money came from.
Just a few months ago...(actually a few more than that) Ontario was poised to have a deficit of around $2billion. Now, out of the blue(or our pockets) we suddenly hear that Mr Greg says we have billions extra because...they have overtaxed us.(ok, he didn't say that..I did)
So instead of returning the money to the people that once owned it, the Liberals are prepared to spend it wherever they need in order to shore up support going into the next election.
"We are more deeply rooted in an era of balanced budgets," Greg says. Well, to me, a balanced set of books would not include billions in extra money.
If the books were truly balanced, we would not have a huge surplus. That surplus came from us in the form of excessive taxation.
It isn't so bad to see a surplus, but when you have a surplus combined with high taxes and a government that has reduced services,(or refused to provide them at all while spending tax dollars fighting parents of autistics) then you realize that you were just screwed.

Another Canadian Soldier Extinguished

ROADSIDE BOMB KILLS ANOTHER SOLDIER
A Canadian soldier escorting a convoy in southern Afghanistan has died from injuries after his convoy ran over the roadside bomb.
The 23-year-old from the Montreal area was with the Royal 22nd Regiment, the Quebec-based Van Doos. He is the first member of the regiment to die in Afghanistan and the 67th Canadian military casualty overall since 2002.
The military is not releasing the soldier's name or rank at the request of his family.
The incident happened about five kilometres east of Masum Ghar, considered a hotspot.
Canadas' involvement in Afghanistan has been costly in terms of human life.
The issues in Afghanistan are more than just a cut and dried military operation and should be instead treated as a major policing effort against internal crime and street violence.
It is impossible for our military to grasp control of the situation as we are fighting an unknown enemy with little regard for rules who are even utilizing suicide as a tool of war.

18 August 2007

Caravan to Montebello

Despite rumoured police checkpoints,hundreds of protesters will join a caravan of buses and cars to Montebello to oppose the meeting of Bush/Harper/Calderon and the SPP.
The People's Global Action (PGA) is on the highway leading to the meeting in a convoy with their vehicles.
Earlier today, Stephane Dion, leader of the opposition Liberal aprty, asked Mr Harper to approach th talks with clarity and openess, and to ensure that Canadian water wasn't on the list of items to be discussed.

15 August 2007

Giant "Trojan horse" on health care tour comes to Woodstock

Tour warning Ontarians of dangers of health care privatization
A replica of the historical Trojan horsewarning of the dangers of health care privatization is coming to Woodstock onThursday, August 16. The 15-foot Trojan horse is touring the province and visitingcommunities, summer fairs, festivals and health care facilities. The tour istravelling to over 60 communities and launched in Kenora on July 18. <<>> The province-wide tour is organized by the Ontario Health Coalition(OHC). The OHC created the giant wooden horse to bring the dangers ofpublic-private hospitals and other health care privatization to the public'sattention. The OHC is the broadest public interest group on health care in Ontario.Its network is strengthened by over 400 grassroots community organizations,including over 50 local health coalitions in communities across the province.

Oh Where Oh Where Has His Little Dog Gone?

HAS WOODSTOCK FORGOTTEN ABOUT ITS' PROMISE TO HIRE AN INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER?
Recently, like a few months ago already, Woodstock City Council passed a motion to hire an integrity commissioner to investigate the wrongdoings and mishandling of the private business that we are on the hook for, Woodstock Info Energy.
I highly doubt anything good will come out of this anyway as some of the parties involved in the business are on the hiring committee for the position of integrity commissioner.
This points directly to a conflict of interests. Woodstocks' mayor should step aside from that particular committee that is doing the hiring as he sat as Chairman of the Board at Woodstock Info Energy.
Until that happens we can safely say that nothing good will come out of any hiring, and that we are entering a phase of money wasting.

If They Are Afraid To Answer Now..What Will They Do When Elected?


NOTHING!

And the Dog Doooo award goes to.....
Brian Jackson...

Okay..sometimes it's better to keep your mouth shut when in doubt, but are we to believe that most people running for office are in doubt?

Recently I sent a letter in to Brian Jackson, the Liberal Candidate for Oxford(provincial) asking him for some information on his position regarding autism treatment. That letter went out 2 weeks ago. I figure that 2 weeks is enough for this guy to wait. Brian must be a very busy man. Brian just doesn't want to answer this guy.

So, I called my CONservative MPP Ernie Hardeman on the same matter and I received a forthright in depth answer less than 24 hours later. Sadly, it is almost gut wrenching to say that I may support him, but I have to as he is the only person who seems willing to take the issue up.

Besides that, at least he has the ability to respond.

Jackson is probably all about himself, and nothing about the people that make up this riding.

Sometimes I think perhaps I should run myself...so I have someone to actually vote for. I'd rather "waste" my vote on myself, than waste it on people who cannot account for their actions and behaviours while in office..

Letter from Jeff Brick..UTRCA

A Letter From Jeff Brick Detailing UTRCA's Position

ONHS Criteria Applicable to Burgess Park and Standard Tube Properties
August 13, 2007
Page 1 of 4
MEMO
___________________________________________________________________________________
Background
Further to the recent request from Connie Lauder, Woodstock Representative on the UTRCA Board of
Directors, the following comments are provided.
The UTRCA was requested to provide information on the recently completed Oxford Natural Heritage
Study (ONHS) to assist the City of Woodstock Council with deliberations on future options for the
Burgess Park and Standard Tube properties. It is noted that the UTRCA has provided background
technical information as requested to various parties related to the property over the last number of
months. Information provided is summarized as follows:
1. A series of three maps were prepared very early in the process and distributed to a number of
parties. The maps show the following information for the Burgess Park/Standard Tube
properties:
a. Map showing the natural hazard constraint areas
b. Map showing the natural heritage resources
c. Map showing the Naturalization projects completed in the area
2. Information on the Draft Woodstock Natural Heritage Inventory Project
3. Information on the Pits and Mounds Project
Information on the ONHS was not provided early in the process because the study was not completed.
Also, resources to assist with interpretation of the ONHS results needed to be developed. A Draft EIS
Guideline document which includes information on interpretation of patches and validation of ONHS
criteria at the site specific level has now been completed. The results of the ONHS, along with comments
on applicability and interpretation are included in the following sections.
ONHS Status and Applicability
The ONHS was presented to County Council at the October 25, 2006 meeting. A supporting planning
report (Community and Strategic Planning - C-3 2006-340) was presented that included 10
recommendations for the consideration of County Council. County Council received the ONHS study,
approved three of the planning report recommendations and directed that the remaining seven
recommendations be distributed to the area municipalities for comment. Presentations have been made to
each of the area municipalities on the ONHS and the municipalities have been asked to provide comments
to the Community and Strategic Planning Department to be compiled and brought back to County
Council.
It is the opinion of the UTRCA that the science results of the ONHS have been outlined in the final
ONHS report and that these results should be used to assess the natural heritage implications of
development proposals. It is understood that there will be a transition period and that there is a need to
develop supporting documents, such as the EIS Guideline Document, to assist with interpretation and
To: Bob McFarland, City of Woodstock
From: Jeff Brick, Coordinator, Hydrology & Regulatory Services
Date: August 13, 2007
Subject: Application of the Oxford Natural Heritage Study
Results: UTRCA Technical Comments
Burgess Park and Standard Tube Properties
::ODMA\GRPWISE\UT_MAIN.UTR
CA_PO.File_Centre_Library:67490.1
ONHS Criteria Applicable to Burgess Park and Standard Tube Properties
August 13, 2007
Page 2 of 4
implementation of the ONHS results.
ONHS Results for the Burgess Creek and Standard Tube Properties Area
A series of maps are attached as follows:
Table 1: Listing of maps attached to this memorandum
Map # Title Information Included
Map 1: Air Photo 1:10,000 (1 cm = 100m) air photo of the area. The air photo was
taken in May of 2006. Ownership parcel information is shown to
give an indication of property lines in the area.
Map 2: ONHS Patches in
the Area
Shows both the patches in the area that meet one or more ONHS
criteria and the patches that meet zero ONHS criteria. The patches
that meet one or more criteria are considered to be significant.
Map 3: ONHS Patch
Highlighted
Highlights the ONHS patch that is found on the Burgess and
Standard Tube properties. It is one contiguous patch that meets six
ONHS criteria.
Map 4: Woodstock
Natural Heritage
Inventory Patches
Map showing the patches from the Woodstock Natural Heritage
Inventory project. Patches 89 and 100 extend onto the property. It
is noted that more detailed vegetation information was collected by
BioLogic and peer reviewed by Earth Tech.
Map 5: Natural Hazards Shows the natural hazard features of the property for information.
Map 3 shows that the Burgess Park and Standard Tube properties contain a single contiguous patch that
meets six ONHS criteria. The nine ONHS criteria are shown in Table 2 with the six criteria that are met
indicated.
It is noted that the ONHS Criteria were applied across the Oxford County landscape using geographic
information systems modeling and relying on April 2000 air photography. For this reason, it is
necessary to have a process to confirm that the landscape level information has been properly applied at
the site level. As noted in the background section, this process has now been developed and it is outlined
in the Oxford County EIS Guideline Document, Draft 1.1, July, 2007. A copy of this document is
attached. Given the scale of the mapping used and the desktop nature of the exercise, it is important to
note that the site specific groundtruthing process is likely to lead to some refinement of the patch
boundaries and may result in some patches being removed or other patches being added.
The process involves first confirming that an identified patch is actually a natural patch, that it is properly
mapped and that it meets a criterion from the study. It is anticipated that this assessment could be made
with a reconnaissance level site visit and without the need for detailed, multi season inventory
information. If detailed inventory data is available, as is the case with the Burgess Park and Standard
Tube properties, it will assist with the patch verification process. Patches that are confirmed to be
significant (is a natural patch and meets one or more criteria) based on the assessment are to be
maintained as they are providing an ecological function to the County landscape. The second step
involves assessing how potential impacts from the proposed development will be mitigated to ensure that
there is no disruption of the ecological function of the verified patches. This process will follow a
conventional Environmental Impact Study type process with consideration given to the specific
community characteristics of the patches and factors such as the type, scale and intensity of the proposed
activity. This process can also consider other site specific information to lead to an overall natural
ONHS Criteria Applicable to Burgess Park and Standard Tube Properties
August 13, 2007
Page 3 of 4
heritage plan for the site. In the case of the Burgess Park and Standard Tube properties, opportunities to
enhance the site with additional plantings and incorporation of the fallow areas that are not identified as
natural heritage in the ONHS could be assessed as part of this process.
Table 2: Patches on the site that meet ONHS Criteria for Significance, ONHS, 2006.
Ecological Function
1 Patches that contain rare species. Rare species are based on MNR’s
Natural Heritage Information Centre occurrences of species with federal,
provincial, regional and local designations.
2. Patches that contain habitat designated in the Official Plans of
Oxford County. These designated habitats include Life Science Areas of
Natural and Scientific Interest or ANSIs, Environmentally Significant Areas
or ESAs, identified wetlands including Provincially Significant Wetlands and
Locally Significant Wetlands, other protected areas.
3. Patches within 150m of designated, non-wetland habitats in the Official
Plans (e.g. Life Science ANSIs, ESAs, and other protected areas) or within
750m of designated wetland habitats in the Official Plan (e.g. PSWs and
LSWs).
4. Patches > 10ha in size.
5. Patches with interior habitat. Interior is defined as the amount of habitat
left after 100m have been removed from the inside perimeter. Thus, a
habitat must be over 200 m across to contain interior.
6. Patches that occur within well-head capture zones or intrinsic
groundwater susceptibility areas. These areas are identified in
groundwater studies.
7. Patches that contain an open watercourse or are within 50 m of an
open watercourse.
Representation
8. Patches with the largest amount of area on each landform and soil
type in Oxford County and all patches that occur on valley lands.
Valley lands are identified through the Conservation Authority slope stability
and erosion lines.
9. Patches that contain large amounts of each natural vegetation
community type: wet conifer > 4ha, wet mixed > 60ha, shrub > 4ha, wet
deciduous > 45ha, conifer > 15ha and mixed > 45 ha, open wetland >10 ha
and deciduous > 20ha. The cut-off thresholds were determined by plotting
distribution curves of area and vegetation community types.
Met in Burgess /
Standard Tube
Patch
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
ONHS Criteria Applicable to Burgess Park and Standard Tube Properties
August 13, 2007
Page 4 of 4
Next Steps
The UTRCA is providing the technical information outlined in this memorandum to the City of
Woodstock to be provided to the participants in the Burgess Park and Standard Tube process. To be fair
to all of the participants in the process, the UTRCA has declined to meet individually with any of the four
parties that submitted proposals since the deadline for submissions passed. UTRCA staff will make every
effort to be available for the upcoming meeting of the four parties to provide technical assistance as
needed.
Finally it is recognized that the information that is provided has differing implications on the four
proposals that have been submitted. We do feel that it is important for all of the participants in the
process to be aware of this information as the process to consider potential changes of use of the
properties moves forward. We do understand that the process will need to focus on choosing a use for the
site and that much of the detailed design of whatever use is selected will follow later.
If there any questions on the information or mapping provided, please contact the undersigned at extension
228.
Yours truly,
UPPER THAMES RIVER CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
_________________________________
Jeff Brick, MCIP, RPP,
Coordinator, Hydrology & Regulatory Services
Attachments:
1. Maps 1 -5
2. Oxford County EIS Guideline Document, Draft 1.1, July, 2007 with Appendix A
Map 1: Air Photo (May 2006) for Burgess Park and Standard Tube areas including ownership parcel information
1:10,000 Scale (1 cm = 100 m)
Prepared August 1, 2007
The UTRCA disclaims explicitly any warranty,
representation or guarantee as to the content,
sequence, accuracy, timeliness, fitness for a
particular purpose, merchantability or completeness
of any of the data depicted and provided herein.
The UTRCA assumes no liability for any errors,
omissions or inaccuracies in the information provided
herein and further assumes no liability for any
decisions made or actions taken or not taken by any
person in reliance upon the information and data
furnished hereunder.
This map is not a substitute for professional advice.
Please contact UTRCA staff for any changes,
updates and amendments to the information
provided.
Data Sources:
Data used under licence with the Ontario Ministry of
Natural Resources, Copyright © Queen's Printer for
Ontario, 1994, 2006; City of London. 2000 Aerial
Photography Copyright © 2006 UTRCA and