News...Straight from hell. These are the days my friend...i'm pretty sure they'll never end.

30 December 2007

US Government May Move To Protect Canadas' Polar Bears

WHILE CANADAS' GOVERNMENT SITS ON ITS' ASS, US GOVERNMENT PLANS PROTECTION FOR POLAR BEARS
The American Fish and Wildlife Service has plans to announce within days whether or not it will classify the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act.
This type of designation is one rung below endangered status, but similar beacuase it offers legislated protection for the animal and its' ecosystems.
Behind the US proposal are declines in polar bear populations, most importantly in the western Hudson Bay area, where Environment Canada and others have documented a 22-per-cent drop in polar bear numbers since the 1980s because of the earlier breakup of Arctic ice where the bears hunt for seals.
Environment Canda researcher Nick Lunn says that since he began tracking the animals in the 1980's that there has been a substantial decrease in population from more than 1200, to approximately 935 bears in Canadas' entire north.
"I feel sort of like a polar bear historian, that I'm sort of documenting a decline of a particular population, and that sort of makes me sad," Mr. Lunn said. "Back in the 1980s, bears would come ashore in really good condition. They had lots of fat on them, big bears, lots of cubs being produced.""Now they are in poor shape, not much fat, and rarely do we see cubs".
The decision by the US government is expected no later than January 9, 2008 and will have far reaching impacts on Canadas' environmental policies in the north.
A team of 14 researchers has spent the past year putting together a plan of action, and more than 600,000 people signed petitions asking the US government to take action.
The most vociferous objections, aside from those of the oil and gas industry, came from Canadians, including the government of Nunavut, the Inuvialuit Game Council, the president of an Ontario-based Arctic travel company and several other aboriginal agencies.
The government of Nunavut have opposed the plan saying their people will suffer income losses(the average american will pay $25,000.00 for a guided polar bear hunt)and that the US government has no right to place environmental restrictions pertaining to wildlife on their(Nunavut) territory.
"We oppose the listing of polar bears because it is currently unwarranted, highly speculative and will hurt Inuit and our economy," Nunavut Environment Minister Patterk Netser said.
"Polar bears have become a political tool for environmental groups trying to force a change in U.S. climate change policy."

One More Dead Canadian Soldier

LIKE I'VE SAID BEFORE...THIS IS A WAR OF ATTRITION
The possibility that Canada is winning the war in Afghanistan received another blow yesterday after another Canadian soldier was killed while driving past a roadside bomb that exploded near Kandahar.
A convoy of soliders headed back to Kandahar for New Years' eve celebrations at the Canadian forces Base was left mourning its' dead instead of partying in Afghanistan last night. Gunner Jonathan Dion died of shrapnel injuries after his convoy ran over the improvised bomb about 20 kilometres west of the city. Four other soldiers suffered minor injuries and are expected to make full recoveries.
Gunner Dion was a part of a group who were to be rotated in early March and returned home for some well needed rest. He was a native of Quebec.

Canadian Government Sends Assistance To Korea for Cleanup

ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTER TEAM ON ITS WAY TO KOREA
The Canadian government has deployed several teams of environmental specialists to the west coast of Korea where an oil tanker was rammed by another cargo ship puncturing 4 oil tanks on the ship earlier this month.
The 147,000-tonne Hebei Spirit has leaked more than 10,000 tonnes of crude oil into the sea which has subsequently washed up on the west coast of Korea, threatening several eco preserves on the coastline. Hundreds of aqua farmers in the area have lost all of their potential for raising seafood products as a result of the collision.
More than 5,000 people including local residents are reported to be involved in the cleanup including hundreds of out of country persons, as well as the now present Canadians.
The Canadians will work under the auspices of the international environmental assessment team coordinated by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP)and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs(OCHA).
The spill occurred in the first week of December and the request for assistance from the republic of Korea came to the Canadian government on December 23, 2007.

25 December 2007

This is a really old news release

HOW DO YOU PROMISE SOMETHING THAT YOU DO NOT ALREADY OWN?????
PLEASE NOTE THE DATE THEY MADE THE POST.....
Golf news releases, stories, and tournament listings for London and Southwestern Ontario.
FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Register
Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
New Woodstock Golf Course Under Construction

In the News Forum Index -> London & Area News
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author
Message
Jeffrey ReedJoined: 06 May 2005Posts: 2311Location: London, Ontario CANADA
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:01 pm Post subject: New Woodstock Golf Course Under Construction

The Villages of Sally Creek, a new community from Claysam Homes, includes a new John Robinson-designed golf course. Official opening of 18 holes is slated for 2008. Construction is underway. The new neighbourhood, west of Vansittart Avenue, includes a variety of homes, a community centre, and an assisted-living residence. Visit http://www.sallycreek.com/ for more information.
Back to top

');
//-->


Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First

In the News Forum Index -> London & Area News
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to: Select a forum In the News----------------Wilson Golf Reed On The GreensLondon & Area NewsGolf StoriesNews ReleasesGolf Equipment NewsTournament ListingsCanadian TourRCGAGAOCJGACanadian and Ontario PGA19th HoleHole-In-One Club2006 CN Canadian Women's Open You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Invading Iran Could Lead To Oil Prices Of $200.00 a Barrel

IRANIAN INVASION COULD SEND WORLD OIL PRICES TO THE $200.00 MARK
According to Hugo Chavez, the elected dictator of Venezuala, any invasion of Iran would lead to oil prices hovering near the $200.00 a barrel mark for the first time in recorded history.
Chavez stated that as a result of any invasion, and the fact that Iran has no oil producing/processing friends, (aside from Venezuala)an invasion of that country would lead to the possibility that the oil industry in Iran would close down until the invasion/war was over, which according to Chavez, could last for years, and would drive oil prices through the roof and slow western economies down considerably unless the US government frees up its' strategic reserves which would put some downward pressure on crude oil prices, but would only be a stop gap measure.
If the United States attacked Iran, it would almost certainly be a messy campaign, with no quick outcome and the likelihood that Iran’s oil production would be disrupted - with an obvious upward impact on crude prices.
Irans' only oil-producing allies - are Venezuela and Venezuala has reiterated support for the government of Iran in this Us/Iran conflict of interests.
Any invasion would see Venezuala cut production and sale of peteroleum derivatives to the USA and its' sister markets.
Perhaps the US instead of invading Iraq for oil, should just invade Venezuala. Venezuala is sitting on the largest reserves of crude oil in the world, almost double that of the middle east.
The Orinoco tar sands are a source of massive wealth for the country, but nationalization efforts in Venezuala have dried up all sources of foreign funding and the country is having difficulty maintaining production as a result of this lack of foreign investment.
$200.00 a barrel oil?
We'll just have to wait and see, but in the meantime, it may not be a bad idea to start looking at those hybrid cars, and perhaps governments should begin the push for a new renewable enrgy force that is affordable and clean. Ethanol is looking kind of good.

Southern USA Drought Conditions Will Spur Waterless Urinals

WATERLESS URINALS ARE ON THE WAY
The drought facing several southern states like Florida and Georgia may help facilitate a change to water-free urinals.While the concept of waterless urinals has yet to catch on in most U.S. states, sales people have said that the existence of the lengthy drought has made the restroom items more attractive to citizens."We've started gaining a little ground," said Gary Rogers, who sells water-free urinals in North Carolina. "If nothing else, it's a conversation piece."Falcon Waterfree Technologies head Robert Turner said that while Florida and Georgia have warmed to the idea of waterless urinals, some states have remained resistant to implementing the unusual technology."In Florida and Atlanta and with the federal government, with them it's no longer a question about the technology," Turner said. "That's not the case in the Carolinas and Tennessee."Rather than using water, the advanced urinals use filters to trap the odor while allowing the liquid to easily flow through a special drain.
The concept is sure to spread across North America as we struggle to contain our water usage.

Feds Hand Out 32,000 Employment Insurance Cheques Accidently

32,000 Unemployed Western Canadians Given Bonus EI Cheques
Thousands of Canadians in the west mistakenly received an "extra" issue of their EI from the federal government over the last few weeks - and the government wants it back.
Nearly 32,000 people receiving EI benefits got back-to-back payments, as a result of a technical problem at the EI Computer Centre in Manitoba.
The government has requested repayment from those persons and wants its money returned three weeks into the new year.
One person said that "Some people might not have even noticed they were overpaid, then spent the money before Christmas and now have to pay it back along with their other bills." "That's a pretty big glitch."
People in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia and the Yukon either had a pair of cheques sent to them within just a few days, or had two payments directly deposited into their bank accounts.
Service Canada officials have confirmed the overpayment, stating the federal department has offered an apology in a letter dated Dec. 13 to clients for "any inconvenience this may have caused you."
They say the technical problem was corrected to ensure the situation wouldn't happen again, and it mentioned another letter would be on the way to explain how the money could be repaid.
Information provided by Service Canada indicated clients have a "three-week grace period" after the holidays before the department would begin collecting.
Service Canada said it would be "sensitive in working with clients to assist them in repaying this money in a reasonable timeframe."
One person figures the entire hassle will cost Canadian taxpayers a lot.
"What bothers me the most is that they've printed and sent out these extra cheques, so that's all this extra paper and postage wasted," she said. "Then they send us the first letter and tell us another letter is coming - more waste. You wonder if they have to hire someone to do the work to get the money back.
"How many thousands is this going to cost us?"

Merry Christmas Everyone...Watch Out For The Dreaded Harper Hangover!

IF YOU WISH A CARD FROM ME...YOU WILL HAVE TO CLICK THE LINK TO GET IT!
Everyone Be good, And Stay Healthy.

Canadian Ambassador To Iran Expelled

Canadas' Ambassador To Iran Leaves Iran
Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier said Canadas' ambassador to Iran had been ordered to leave the country yesterday after some disagreement with Iran over its' human rights record and its' nuclear energy program(most likely over the arrest and beating death of Canadian journalist Zahra Kazemi for which Canadas' government has been highly critical)which leaves the diplomatic outpost under the care of a charge d'affaires until a resolution can be reached between Tehran and Ottawa.
Ottawa sent Gordon Venner to Iran in 2004 to take the place of Philip MacKinnon, who was recalled over the Kazemi affair. At the time the family of the slain photojournalist accused the government of not looking into the matter, and of not pushing the Ambassador(McKinnon)to seek answers from the Iranian government.

QUEEN STARTS YOU TUBE VIDEO CHANNEL

"The Royal Channel" now On You Tube
The Royal family has started it's own You Tube channel. Anyone iterested in the British monarchy will be interested in seeing the historical footage available here.

22 December 2007

Okay, I have been as busy as hell, but there are a couple of important things to remember.

THINGS ARE INSANELY BUSY THIS WEEK
The week has passed very quickly for me. I can hardly believe that it is Saturday already and that we only have a couple of days left to go out and do a few errands before the holidays kick in. I've been busy packing boxes for people, and making delieveries to the post office. The couriers picked up their final pickups that were US bound yesterday. Now I'm hoping for some rest...
This year our business really turned into a major international business and we are certain that this growth will continue into the next year. We'll just see what happens on that front.
This week tons of people came in to both of my shops to vent their anger over the Burgess Park issue, many wondering how this council could have chosen to overirde the concerns of the community in favour of murdering our parklands. Many people expressed their thanks for the time investment we made, and many people made pledges to support us wherever it is we take this thing now.
And that is where we are headed....to the UTRCA and the provincial minister responsible for the environment. It is not in the communities best interests to see these wetlands and conservation areas destroyed for private profit. It is shameful that our local government would act with such blatant disregard for the concerns of thousands of taxpayers, but it is not out of the ordinary.
Yes, it is disturbing but nothing unusual.
These people will kiss your ass as long as they are trying to get elected, and they will make you all of the promises in the world. But in the end, it doesn't really matter as they are elected to serve themselves first, elected secondly to support the needs of the corporation of Woodstock, and finally, if we are lucky, they might support us, but highly unlikely that they will.
Most will just turn their backs knowing that for the next few years they are immune from your consternation.
To get rid of Harding we need to ensure there is only one or maybe 2 candidates running against him. The voter split ensured his win this last election because of the 4 candidates who ran.
If that would have been the case last year, he would have lost. He has negligible support in the community, much less than 30%..one of the lowest ratings a mayor could have. I have yet to find a person who says they voted for him...or perhaps those persons are ashamed or embarrassed to say they voted for him.
What we could hope for is Talbot to run against him, and her and Harding both lose to a third person. This would rid us of those two persons, and perhaps put a balance back to council that is well needed.
Anyways, have an awesome day in Woodstock.

18 December 2007

This Burgess Park Thing....Again

Just A Thought On Burgess Park
One thing I would like to point out in this mess of a "deal" with Burgess and Standard tube Parks is that this half-wit council,(excluding two elected persons, Deb Tait and Jim Northcott) have tossed aside the desires of a large portion of the electorate(thousands upon thousands of persons) in order to appease one company owned by a very few persons(or even perhaps just one person) who wish to develope our conservation lands into a private for profit golf course. The numbers do not add up. Thousands of people "trumped" in order to satiate one companys' desires? I think it's wierd. Don't the rest of you? Woodstock will gain nothing. In fact, Woodstock will lose, and will lose big. We will be denied access and opportunity to our natural eco-heritage. The people of our community and the communities which surround Woodstock like Hickson, Embro,Tavistock, Beachville and the thousands of people who live in between,are who has lost. All of the people of Woodstock and the eco system will lose in the future. We have been robbed of recreational opportunities that could have included the entire community at very little cost, but instead our council in a frenzy gave a massive opportunity to one development company. And for that reason, we should all be asking ourselves, just what has happened, and why? If any of you wonder why voter turnout is so low in these municipal "elections", you need not look any further ; we have a shining example of such a phenomena that meets every couple of weeks in Woodstocks' council chambers. It's a travesty to see them sit there, all smug and content in the knowledge that they can stab you in the back while smiling at you for the next 3 or 4 years, and there is squat that you can do about it as a citizen. I'm quite happy that two persons understood the necessity of maintaining the parks that we have over a "long shot" at nothing in the future. Now all we need are 4 or 5 more of them, and Woodstock would be a fantastic city versus the mediocrity we are experiencing at present.

12 December 2007

Syri-Con Corporation Fined $75,000.00 for workplace injuries

WOODSTOCK COMPANY CONVICTED OF WORKPLACE SAFETY VIOLATIONS
A Woodstock-based company was fined$75,000 following a trial in the Ontario Court of Justice, December 12, 2007,in connection with the injury of a worker in a forklift accident. The incident happened at the Syri-Con Corporation's concrete plant at48 Brentwood Dr., Princeton, Ontario, on June 22, 2006. Justice of the PeaceDan McDonald found that on the day of the incident a worker was working with acolleague to move 455 kilogram (1,000 lb.) concrete panels from the castingfloor to a flat bed truck for delivery. The overhead crane normally used tolift the panels was not working, and the workers varied the workplace's normalprocedure by modifying a forklift to lift the panels and load them on thetruck. When lifting a panel the chains that attached the panel to the modifiedforklift slipped, the forklift operator lowered the panel and the other workerattempted to secure it. The panel tipped, pinning the worker, resulting inmultiple broken bones. Justice of the Peace Dan McDonald found that the employer failed to havethe modifications to the forklift inspected by a competent person and failedto take every reasonable precaution in the circumstances for the protection ofa worker. McDonald registered convictions on three counts: breaches ofsections 51(1)(a) and 45(a) of Regulation 851 for Industrial Establishments,contrary to section 25(1)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act; and abreach of section 25(2)(h) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. The finelevied on each count was $25,000. In addition to the fine, the court imposed a 25-per-cent victim finesurcharge on the total, as required by the Provincial Offences Act. Thesurcharge is credited to a special provincial government fund to assistvictims of crime.

Ontario Judical Appointments include Local Lawyer

GORD LEMON APPOINTED TO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE IN AND AROUND ONTARIO
The Honourable Gordon D. Lemon , a lawyer with Innes, Lemon Barristers in Woodstock , is appointed a judge of the Superior Court of Justice in and for the Province of Ontario. He
replaces Mr. Justice J.R. Belleghem ( Brampton) who elected to become a supernumerary judge. Mr. Justice Lemon received a Bachelor of Laws in 1981 from the Osgoode Hall Law School, and a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Toronto in 1978. He was admitted to the Bar of Ontario in 1983. Mr. Justice Lemon, a former counsel with Barenberg, McDonald is a present Partner with Innes, Lemon Barristers . Mr. Justice Lemon has developed an expertise in family, criminal and civil litigation, and mediation. Mr. Justice Lemon is a member of the Canadian Bar Association, Criminal Lawyer’s Association, ADR Institute of Canada, and the Advocates Society.
Congratulations Gordon. You will make a fine judge for Ontarios' Supreme Court!
Congratulations to Woodstock for producing such a fine lawyer.

And These Are The Faces Of The Anti-Environment Movement In Woodstock, Ontario






THESE 'CONCERNED" CONCILLORS VOTED TO KILL OUR CONSERVATION AREAS

I guess a good name for these folks would be the "Asses of Evil".

I am not impressed, but hey, what the heck. For your information, here are the faces of those who decided that green space is not necessary, trees are bad, and admissionless parks for people are just stupid. These same people feel that the people of Woodstock do not need outdoor recreation opportunities, and feel that having the citizens pay as you go for a park we already own is wise.

These same councillors will attempt to claim they have your interests at heart.

That is a lie. They have their interests at heart, and the interests of their political donors at heart, but not yours or mine.


Here is a statement from Myor Hardings' inaugural speech....


"During this new four year term, we will have 96 scheduled meetings as City Council and
again as many planning meetings. We will work together for more than 300 hours and
make thousands of decisions over the next almost 1,500 days. We will need the best each
of us has to offer and we will need to work together. For there can be no doubt that we
are here because we want to do what is right and in the broad public interest for the
people of Woodstock and that is what those that elected us expect."


I kind of like that statement...

Especially the big lie about "because we want to do what is right and in the broad public interest for the people of Woodstock and that is what those that elected us expect".....

kinda brings tears to your eyes, doesn't it?

Well, the reason it brings tears to my eyes is the fact that this mayor lied, and does not have the interests of thousands of Woodstonians at heart. He has blatantly ignored the will of the people, has consistently voted against the people, and is responsible for leading the city into an irresponsible mess of a situation in the deal with Burgess Park.

Or how about this statement....

"We have welcomed, and indeed encouraged more delegations to come forward to ensure
that Council’s decisions are made with consideration of community expectations."

What decisions have you recently made where you took the advice of the community that elected you? Certainly no community member advice(you can't call a development company a community member...they have no right to vote, have no rights under the law as a person, and are not considered persons under the law)was used to make the Burgess Park decision.

This is a really cool statement ...

"
Our Council meetings have indeed become our town hall meetings".

I'm not sure where Harding spend his council meetings, but Woodstock does not hold town hall meetings...if they did, plenty would bring pitchforks with them to deal with that council.

Here is a really good one as well...


"Council had the pleasure recently of acknowledging and celebrating the work of our
Advisory committees. Hundreds of our citizens over the last three years have volunteered
their time and effort to help our council make wise decisions. Their support is
appreciated."

Mr Harding, if you actually appreciated the toils of the poor peons that were "appointed" by you to run those committees, you might actually pay some heed to them, but otherwise, the "stringing" along of numerous people who were "appointed" to those committees is nasty.

In the case of WEAC, they issued a great report on the issue of Burgess Park, supported maintaining the lands as a park/conservation area, and the council of the city of Woodstock(except for 2 good people) just took that report, wiped their asses with it, and told you all to fuck off...because that is what you are worth to Mr Harding.

You were appointed to WEAC because the mayor is given a pile of committees that he can personally stack with whoever or whatever(look at Nelson Simard at the silly community in blooms programs that should be cancelled as we are a community in ruins)and he knows full well that he only does this for political reasons, and not for any other reason. The mayor knows that he will never have to take anything seriously from any committees, and that those committees are used to appease a few people here and there.

And this curious statement at the end...


"For the road before us tonight is not about the destination, but about the journey"


That's right...who cares where you are headed...as long as you head somewhere.


Obviously, that is the only statement he can be trusted on...

He has no destination....he only wants to keep driving around the block until he runs out of gas.

Woodstock City Council(With 2 exceptions)Vote To Lease Our Parks Out To Local Developers.

WOODSTOCK CITY COUNCIL VOTES TO ALLOW THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR LOCAL CONSERVATION LANDS
Personally I think I couldn't have sat back and watched the proceedings from my TV, I had to act, but after 1 year of expending massive efforts I feel sad and dismayed that the council of the city of Woodstock voted to go against the will of the people,(thousands upon thousands of people signed petitions against this sell off/lease arrangement) and to allow for the developement of our local Burgess Park and Standard Tube Conservation areas.
There was some limited discussion of the matter, with several concillors adding to the discussion, but most notable was the almost vomit like statement that Councillor Talbot made alluding to how wonderful a neighbour a golf course makes, and how special she was to have lived on a property that "had the biggest back yard in Woodstock" because her back yard backed onto that "wonderful" place, a golf course, where her and her family walked and collected frogs from pinholes...according to her. Ms Talbot is a very special councillor that had a wonderful childhood growing up on a golf green.
Hmmm, I think if even one of us steps onto the Sally Creek course...we'll be arrested for trespassing. And contrary to Ms Talbots' statements, there will be no access to this golf course...unless you buy a ticket. And I guess a good neighbour is someone who uses council to exproporiate your community's parks for a private developement?
Sobeskis' assertion that he envisions a really nice park in 2040 is wierd at best.
The lease is for 25 years...so where does 2040 factor in? Todays date is 2007, add 25 years and you get, 2032, not 2040. Or is he saying they will give the guy 8 years to empty the place out?
So, out of this entire council, we have 2 persons who were on side who supported the ideals of keeping our green spaces green, and who believed they were their to do the work of the people who elected them, councillors Tait and Northcott. Those persons at least had the inner strength to stand up against those other buffooons on council.
And jesus, what happened to the CAW pick, Ross Gerrie? He sat on his hands, and wasted his opportunity to defend the persons who elcted him.
And our mayor? Where was he? He voted to initiate the Oxford Natural Heritage Study, and even waxed on eloquently in the preamble to the study about how we need to save these precious resources...well, it's amazing what people will say and do, and it's amazing how much they will say just to get their name in the news, or on a document, or just to hear their own name, period.
Here we are sending leaders across the globe to try and save the environment, and on the other hand, our local "leaders"(i tend to think they are followers, and only an election made them leaders, and before they were elected, they were just people with squat knowledge, now they lead us by the nose)are busy trying to kill the environment.
Lets' stop sending people around the globe and wasting money on trying to make other countries "green up'...we can't even get the fools in charge here in our country and community to stand up for the environment so what is the point of making China or India protect theirs, while we smash ours to bits?
So as an end note I would like to say that the fight is not over. We need to exert pressure on Mr McGuinty, and we need to exert pressure on the environment minister(John Gerretsen who I have some history with)and the board of the UTRCA.
We can leave Connie Lauder out...there is no point contacting her, as she has no idea what she is doing and it appears she is biding time until her time is up. A great benchwarmer...or they can use her to introduce motions that she doesn't read or study...that would be a great job for her because she has no idea what the heck she is doing.
October 23, 2007 she actually introduced a motion at the UTRCA board meeting that said they were not prepared to accept a golf course at this time, then she witheld that information from her fellow councillors on city council, only to have it blow up in her face when an ex-RCMP found the information buried in the Oct 23 minutes.
Even though she voted against the golf course at Upper Thames, she voted for the golf course at the city level. Connie Lauder is a HYPOCRITE.
This person needs to go, and she ought to resign. There should be a recall mechanism in place for the people to use to fight against this tyranny .
So, to the thousands of people who came out, who wrote letters, who attended council meetings and fought the honest fight to keep Woodstock green, thank you.
And special thanks to Jim Northcott, and to Deb Tait. it's good to know that someone on counciul actually cares for their community.
The rest of them, well, we won't go their. They are worthless to us... And are only worth something to big business.
Can't wait to see Talbot on that private golf course collecting frogs...can't wait to see her arrested for trespassing.

One Councillors' Stunned Idea..How To Destroy A Public Park...And Make Money For A Private Businessman at The Expense Of Taxpayers


Members of Woodstock City Council
City Hall
Woodstock, Ontario
N4S 7W5

Dear City Councillors
Reference: NORTHSIDE PARK (in the year 2040)
The development of the 148 acres area known as Burgess Park and Standard Tube Park is a planning exercise to determine the best use for the largest open space remaining within the boundaries of the City.
However, some background information may be of assistance in understanding that the objectives of the City with these lands 25 years ago match the same goals today.
Burgess Lands
The Burgess Park parcel acquisition in 1981 demonstrates a unique relationship between the City of Woodstock and the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (UTRCA). The Burgess Park lands are unlike other properties the UTRCA bought for flood control on their own along with ancillary surplus land which resulted from entire farm purchases.
In the case of Burgess land, there was financial participation from the City in the purchase. This "partnership" with the UTRCA led to ownership of the property in the name of the UTRCA. The UTRCA has their piece of land that was required for flood control purposes.
The land use became the responsibility of the City by this partnership agreement, subject only to the permission of the UTRCA under the obligations of the Conservation authorities Act. In other words, within the confines of the City of Woodstock’s zoning by-law and the Oxford County’s Official Plan, the City is acknowledged to be the first authority on land use. The City’s objective for the entire Burgess lands was for a wide range of recreational uses.
Standard Tube Lands
The majority of the Standard Tube lands would appear to have many natural attributes which would be ideal for active and passive recreational activities.
In 1994, discussions indicated any plans for the Standard Tube lands will attempt to maintain as much of the existing wood lots and natural vegetation areas as possible, many of which can be incorporated into passive leisure uses.
The City of Woodstock Land Use Policy states that within major open space classification of land, the predominant uses shall be those which provide for: all forms of outdoor and indoor recreation, including parks, conservation areas, golf courses and swimming pools. Another predominant use would be the enjoyment of an area in its natural state as well as the preservation of distinctive natural features.
Unfortunately, those worthy recreational and environmental goals received limited financial support. Clearly funding for the development of Burgess and Standard Tube lands was at the bottom of the annual priority list. As a result, little has been accomplished in 25 years on Burgess Park and for 15 years on the Standard Tube lands.
Population Growth Projections
Good planning requires determining anticipated population growth. Currently there are a limited number of residential properties north of Pittock Lake. However, the future for new residential subdivisions will be directed to the northern end of the City.
Over the next three decades, one can safely predict that all the lands north of Pittock Lake and south County Road 17 (Tollgate Road) will be residential neighbourhoods. Also the current residential parcels of land bounded by Highway #59 on the east, Tollgate Road on the north and the Eleventh Line on the west will be fully occupied.
One could easily speculate that by the year 2040, the City will have annexed in additional lands north of Tollgate Road and to the west of the Eleventh Line for residential expansion. Regardless, in 30 years, there will be more than sufficient population on the north side of the City to justify the creation of a large "city wide" park.
Proposal by Sally Creek Golf Course
This proposal by the Sally Creek Golf Course to lease 67 acres of Burgess Park / Standard Tube lands to construct nine golf holes.
I think people have overlooked the term lease. A sale is forever, a lease is temporary. Therefore, I view the proposal as a "temporary" golf course with a life expectancy of twenty-five years.
However, notwithstanding the term "temporary", there are important factors that will require specific conditions to be implemented before the approval of the golf course is granted by the City.
Oxford Natural Heritage Study
A major consideration is the Oxford Natural Heritage Study (ONHS). The ONHS was completed in 2006 and looked at a range of natural features and the challenges of preservation.
Although the ONHS is not the official policy of the County of Oxford, the report makes a number of recommendations that can not be ignored. Those recommendations must take precedence over any type of construction activity.
Condition (1):
The Golf Course proposal must promote the overall intention of the recommendations in the ONHS that require the maintenance and enhancement of the terrestrial (land) and aquatic (water) features and functions in the area.
Condition (2):
If a parcel of land meets at least one criteria for Significance of Terrestrial Habitats, then special conditions may be required by the UTRCA and the City to mitigate any potential damage before construction will be allowed.
ONHS Patch 89 and Patch 100
The Woodstock Natural Heritage Inventory outlined two forest cover Patches in the Area of Burgess Park and Standard Tube Properties.
Patch 89:
The majority of this patch is located in the River Valley and is not directly impacted by the proposed golf course. It will be important to establish appropriate buffers for protection of these forested areas.
There is a portion of Patch 89 that does extend in to the proposed golf course area. However, the initial site plans indicate that this portion of Patch 89 will be protected and will remain a woodlot.
Condition (3)
The portion of Patch 89 located on property that could be leased, must remain a woodlot.
Patch 100:
While the initial aerial mapping indicated this may be large forest covered areas, it has been noted, given the scale of the mapping used, that the site specific groundtruthing process is likely to lead to some refinement of the patch boundaries.
Patch 100 appears to be a plantation and may not meet the criteria to be included as part of the patch. While the rows are visible from the air photo, the UTRCA is exercising caution and will not say it is not a patch. They will have to hire an outside proponent to do the work.
Condition (4)
The UTRCA will have a third party complete a criteria review to determine the status of Patch 100.

Environmental Assessment
City staff recommended in November 2006, that an environmental assessment be conducted on these lands before opening up the required public process.
The conclusions indicated that constraints to development need to be identified in order to provide appropriate environmental management to the development of:
an environmentally sensitive golf course layout and design;
the course layout in relation to natural heritage features;
a plan outlining the provision of buffer zones; and
construction mitigation measures for the protection of natural heritage features.
It is a standard practice of the UTRCA to require environmental studies to be conducted. For example, it is common practice for the UTRCA to recommend a three season inventory to support a development proposal. It is not expected that this level of study will be necessary on fallow lands.
The UTRCA does not want any developer to incur significant costs for a number of reasons. The UTRCA prefers to identify logical milestones and determine at each of these milestones whether studies should be expanded. This approach is applicable to the Burgess Park process.
Condition (5):
Any future environmental assessment requirements should be under the control of the UTRCA and the City. While Sally Creek Golf Course has offered to pay for these reports if required, they must understand the study guidelines will be prepared by UTRCA and the City.
Archaeological Assessment
The City shall also complete an archaeological assessment of the Burgess Park and Standard Tube Park properties and document any significant archaeological resources found. No grading shall take place on the subject properties prior to the issuance of a clearance letter by the Ministry of Culture.
Condition (6):
Prior to the signing of the lease agreement, the owner shall submit an archaeological assessment of the subject property and mitigate, through preservation or resource removal and documentation, adverse impacts to any significant archaeological resources found. No grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject property prior to the issuance of a clearance letter by the Ministry of Culture confirming that all archaeological resource concerns have met licensing and resource conservation requirements.
Water Self-Sufficient
It is important that any golf course proposal be self-sufficient in terms of water usage. The golf course can not source any water for irrigation purposes of the entire golf course and putting greens from Sally Creek, the Thames River or the City’s municipal water supply.
Condition (7):
The Sally Creek Golf Course will apply to the Ministry of the Environment for a Water taking Permit for irrigation purposes and this Water Taking Permit will provide irrigation for 18 holes, including the land located in Burgess Park and Standard Tube proposal. The golf course will be self-sufficient in terms of water usage.
Preservation of the Thames River Valley
The proposed lands to be considered for golf course purposes must be outside the Thames River Valley corridor; must not infringe on the lands presently used for the Millennium Trail hiking trails including the maintenance of a "buffer" area between existing trails and adjacent golf holes; or lands containing naturalized parkland.
Condition (8):
Buffer zones must be established to protect lands with natural heritage features; provide open space between development and natural areas and also to provide open space between existing trails and adjacent golf fairways.
Condition (9):
The Federal and Provincial Governments both stringently control the approval and application of pesticides in Canada and Sally Creek Golf Club will be committed to adhering to the policies of all governing bodies regarding the use of pesticides and herbicides.
Condition (10)
Sally Creek Golf Club is committed to the introduction of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) which relies on scientifically –proven plant management techniques to grow healthy plants able to resist pest / disease pressures.
Role of the Upper Thames Conservation Authority
The important role the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (UTRCA) to be responsible to identify and enhance specific monitoring programs; improving the consistency of monitoring techniques; and provided coordinated comprehensive reports on monitoring progress in the area.
Every group participating in these proposals is in full support of the methodologies used by the UTRCA to enhance and protect natural habitats and recognize that any future projects proposed be carried out must be under the guidance and supervision of the UTRCA.
Condition (11)
That the scientific professionalism of senior staff at the UTRCA continue to play a major role in the planning, managing and controlling of all projects impacting on environmental features.

Revenue Generation
The Lease Revenue:
It is recommended that a flat annual lease rate be negotiated between the golf course and the City / UTRCA. The City and the UTRCA would then have to work out a revenue sharing agreement.
All lease income earned by the City will be reinvested into a Reserve for City Wide Parks with the specific objective of funding the conversion of the golf course lands in to a municipal park.
Condition (12):
The Sally Creek Golf Course will negotiate a lease agreement with the City of Woodstock and the UTRCA to lease the proposed lands for 25 year The lease will be for a fixed annual sum based on the market value of the property as determined by the UTRCA..
Condition (13):
City and UTRCA to negotiate the sharing of the lease revenue on a prorated split once a final golf course layout is determined. Also the Ministry of Natural Resources may provide conditions on the UTRCA as to how the lease revenue may be allocated between capital and operational expenses.
Condition (14):
All lease income earned by the City will be reinvested into a Reserve for City Wide Parks with the specific objective of funding the conversion of the golf course lands in to a municipal park.









The Environmental Surcharge
This revenue source would be provided by the golfing public players. The Golf Course would add a surcharge to each round of golf. A special agreement would be required to confirm the long term commitment of the golf course to collect the surcharge.
These funds would be transferred to the UTRCA. The UTRCA would control the allocation of these funds to projects that will enhance and improve the environmental goals to meet the requirements of the Ministry of Natural Resources. Funds could be allocated by the UTRCA on projects in the immediate area.
For example, if the initial surcharge was $1.00 and escalated at 6 cents per annum, over a period of twenty five years, about $1,400,000 in revenue would be generated. These funds will be available to further the objectives of the Upper Thames Conservation Authority. The long term planning for the allocation of these funds will be determined by the UTRCA.
Condition (15):
Sally Creek Ltd to consider introducing an environmental surcharge on each round of golf over the term of the lease with the proceeds to be transferred to the control of the UTRCA for projects to improve the environmental features: on the Sally Creek Golf Course, in Burgess Park and on Standard Tube lands, around Pittock Lake or throughout the UTRCA watershed.

Summary
In reviewing the development of the Thames Valley lands, it is necessary to look beyond a 25 year lease agreement.
I see in thirty years the need for a large city park on the north end of the city to service a large residential community that has grown and expanded over the next two to three decades. The golf course lease puts a "development hold" on those 67 acres. At the conclusion of the lease, the golf course portion on public property would be converted to "Northside Park. The revenue from the golf lease and golfer surcharge will provide an opportunity for the UTRCA to develop a long term showcase plan as to how to enhance the environmental features in the entire Thames Valley lands and maybe beyond.
The UTRCA’s prime interest in obtaining the Burgess property in 1981was the lands were deemed to be significant for flood control purposes. The City of Woodstock’s long term objective has always been to provide a park and recreational facilities, which is why the city’s participated in the acquisition of the Burgess property.
At the end of the next twenty-five years, this vision meets the long term requirements of the Ministry of Natural Resources that this proposal will further the objectives of the Upper Thames River Conservation Area.
Yours Truly
Pat Sobeski
Councillor Pat Sobeski

Harper Blames Liberal Appointees For Nuclear Isotope Dilemna

HARPER REFUSES TO ADDRESS NUCLEAR ISOTOPE SHORTAGE, INSTEAD BLAMES LIBERALS FOR SHORTFALLS
"There will be no nuclear accident," Prime Minister Stephen Harper asserted in the House of Commons, saying the government has received independent advice indicating there is no safety concern. Mr Harper, Canadas' lead nuclear scientist(personally, I thought he was an economist) has assured Canadians that there will be no Three Mile Island styled nuclear meltdown if they start the Chalk River facility back up...minus some very important safeguards...like emergency cooling pumps.
"On the contrary, what we do know is that the continuing actions of the Liberal-appointed Nuclear Safety Commission will jeopardize the health and safety and lives of tens of thousands of Canadians. We do have the responsibility to demand that Parliament step in and fix this situation before the health of more people is put in jeopardy."
Oh my gosh, now Harpo is blaming the Liberal party for his governments inept handling of the nuclear file.
Government House Leader Peter Van Loan attempted to introduce legislation that would see the reactor restarted without proper safeguards in place. "Both Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission must immediately commence working together to ensure that the AECL [reactor] which produces medical isotopes be restarted as quickly as possible, in a safe manner, in order to address the critical shortage of medical isotopes occasioned by the extended shutdown of this research reactor at Chalk River," said Van Loan.
Michael Ignatieff, deputy Liberal leader says that he has been in talks with Harper on the issue, and Ignatieff says he is not prepared to see the reactor started while it is unsafe. He said that Van Loans' motion does nothing with respect to nuclear-health issues or questions related to nuclear safety.
Health Minister Clement and Natural Resources Minister Lunn pointed out that technical experts at the CNSC acknowledge the unit operated safely for many decades and that, if it were restarted, it would be no more dangerous than it was before the shutdown.
AECL assured the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission last year that an emergency power system had been connected to the cooling pumps on the aging nuclear unit. But the CNSC discovered that the upgrades and repairs hadn't been made and as a result, shut down the reactor for repairs.
One of the two backup pump power systems was set to be installed last night or today and AECL has told the government the reactor could be operated safely when that had been done.
It will take weeks to get the reactor back into the production of isotopes and in that time hundreds of thousands of people worldwide will be forced to consider alternative discovery methods for cancer detection if they are available.
The government was well aware last year that there were problems at the facility and one must wonder why they waited for a forced shutdown of the facility before acting on it.
It appears as though the CONservatives stuck their heads in the sand and were just waiting for things to pass, hoping the reactor would somehow repair itself before anyone noticed.
jim bender
woodstock

Australia Signs On To Kyoto, Canada Continues To Deny

CANADIAN GOVERNMENT REFUSES TO ADDRESS GLOBAL WARMING
UN climate chief Yvo de Boer has called the Canadian delegation to Bali led by John Baird, "environmental hypocrites" for its' refusal to address global warming and for stating that Canada will not abide by any targets unless poor developing nations abide by the exact same targets.
John Baird says there is no point to ratifying Kyoto because big pollutters like China and the USA refuse to sign onto any treaty that would see global emissions reduced.
That's right John...just because our neighbours are rude and ignorant means that we should be too, right?
Wrong.
Although I can appreciate why he would consider not ratifying the accord, I do not understand why he hasn't moved to set firm targets...even for our own country. Canada is a major world polluter and as a result, must pay attention to the problems we are facing in our own country in terms of pollution.
Mr Baird has been on the road trying to sell his version of Kyoto, Kyoto really lite, but so far not many countries have agreeed to tag along. He is prepared to reject any future climate treaty unless it sets emissions targets for all major polluters .
Environment ministers from Canadas' provinces went on the record yesterday to blast the government for its' lack of effort in negotiations and they accused the federal conservative Environment minister of attempting to derail or sabotage the talks in Bali.
Liberal Leader Stephane Dion who has more credibility on the environment file than any other Canadian present has spoken out against the lack of negotiations from Baird stating, "It's certainly not enough to say, 'I will do something only if the others do something'," Dion told a meeting of municipal leaders. "The good philosophy is to say, 'I will do the most I can and I ask you to do the same.'"
And that sounds pretty good to me.

10 December 2007

Pros and Cons of Filing a Complaint Against the Police

Pros
 Your complaint is on file and builds on the number of complaints already made. This
means that the police force cannot say that they are doing a good job because no
one is complaining against them.
 Steps may be taken. For example, the police officer may be reprimanded or
suspended.
 If the same officer later charges you just to pay you back for complaining or to
harass you, there will be a written record to support your defence.
Cons
 Because the police will know that you have made the complaint, you and/or your
friends and family may experience retaliation.
 The complaint will probably be investigated by officers in the same division as the
officer you are complaining about.
 You will probably be asked to go to mediation (you do not have to agree to this)
where you will face the police officer. The mediator is supposed to be neutral but
she/he is often another police officer.
 Most complaints do not get to a hearing.

09 December 2007

Massive Landslide In BC Threatens Lake

FRASER VALLEY LANDSLIDE STRIPS MOUNTAIN AND FILLS LAKE WITH DEBRIS
A small earthquake near the town of Tofino, BC has triggered an immense landslide that may threaten the ecosystem of Chehalis Lake near Chilliwack after hundreds of thousands of trees and 2,000 feet of mountainside slid into the lake creating a small Tsunami that tore out bridges(3), roads and washed campgrounds away with its force.
The lake had previously been ringed by cedars and pines but now is ringed by rock after what appears to have been a tsunami ripped away most of the lakes surrounding trees.
B.C.'s Environment Minister Barry Penner who took an aerial tour of the area yesterday described the scene as "unbelievable" and that it is the worst landslide in BC that he has ever heard of or witnessed.
There were no reported injuries or missing persons, and the BC environment ministry will look at whether or not the logs will need to be removed from the lake in order to prevent the downstream flooding of a first nations reserve during the spring thaw.

Hundreds Of People Worldwide Protest Harpers Climate Change Proposal

HARPER ATTEMPTS TO DERAIL GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE TALKS
Protesters across the country and around the globe have asked PM Harper to soften his stance on global warming and to bring Canada to the table in an honest effort to curb the influence of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide.
The Harper government has taken a stance that there is no point in signing a deal when developing nations are not forced to adhere to the same targets that industrialized nations have been presented with under the Kyoto protocol, even though those industrialized nations are responsible for more than 200 years of growth based pollution.
Although there is very little global benefit to only Canada signing the deal, the benefit would be to show some leadership to the developing world in the area of global pollution reduction.
Canadas' reputation as a nation of environmentalists caring for pristine lakes and rivers is certain to fall by the wayside if the Harper government continues to thumb its' nose at making a deal that would actually set firm targets for pollution reduction.
The wealthy nations of the world must step up to the plate and offer something firm for the rest of the world to follow, and this must include sharing the economic costs of reducing global pollution with developing nations that cannot afford the infrastructure changes that are required to slow down the death of the planet.
jim bender,woodstock

South Korean Oil Spill Threatens To Destroy Eco-Reserve

THOUSANDS OF BIRDS AND FISH HAVE SUFFOCATED FROM OIL CONTAMINATION
The South Korean government has launched a massive cleanup effort of 15 km of beaches after a barge carrying a crane, rammed and punctured an oil tanker carrying 11,000 tonnes of crude oil. The oil tankers' hull was punctured in numerous places which led thousands of tonnes of oil to leak from the hull into the sea, approximately 100km from Seoul.
The slick extends about 20 kim from the Hong King registered freighter threatending oyster beds, and beaches along the western coast of Korea.
The government of Korea has sent more than 100 ships, 2000 troops and 6000 civilians to the theatened zone with buckets and absorbent clothes to clean rocks, wash birds and to scoop up oil from the beachfront.
They estimate a cleanup time of 4-6 weeks working day and night.

06 December 2007

Chalk River Nuclear Facility Repairs Leads To Global Shortage Of Radioactive Isotopes

RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES USED FOR CANCER TREATMENT ARE IN EXTREME SHORTAGE
A Canadian nuclear reactor at Chalk River Ontario has been shut down for repairs leaving 10,000 Ontario patients and 80,000 Canadian patients without access to needed radioactive isotoes which are used to detect cancers, and to treat cancers.
The biggest problem with these isotopes is the limited shelf life they have after production. Some isotopes are effective for only 6 hours while others might have a shelf life of 2 weeks.
"There is only one reactor in the North American continent that actually supplies most of these agents," said Dr. Christopher O'Brien, president of the Ontario Association of Nuclear Medicine, referring to the facility in Chalk River. "When this reactor goes down there is a significant impact."
Dr O'Brien stated that what Ontario is doing now is rationing these treatments or simply not offering them at all for the time being. Some patients may have an opportunity to go for MRI's instead, but the wait list for those diagnostic treatments is months.
The shortage could last for as little as two weeks, but the company in charge of distribution says that wait could extend well into January causing tremendous stress on an already over-taxed system.
Health Minister George Smitherman said they are monitoring the situation .
"We are certainly in a circumstance within a number of days where there will be shortages and that this will force our front-line health care to make sure they're using available resource in a way that best supports priority patients. In the next three or four days the implications for us are going to become clearer."

Movement To Dump John Tory Gains Steam

TOP LEVEL CONSERVATIVES MOVE ON JOHN TORY
A meeting of high-level Progressive Conservatives was held last night to launch a campaign to dump John Tory as leader.
In the wake of the disastrous Oct. 10 election showing, senior Conservatives are pushing for a Yes vote in February's leadership review, which would trigger a race for a new leader.
"There are a lot of people unhappy with the election result and there's a growing demand for change," a source said yesterday.
A dinner was held last night at the Toronto home of Ron McLaughlin, former chief of staff to one-time premier Mike Harris, for about a dozen top Conservatives.Others expected to attend include John Weir, a former Harris chief of staff; Jeremy Adams, campaign manager of now federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's 2005 provincial leadership bid; and former PC president Rueben Devlin.Sources say disaffected backers of Tory's 2005 leadership, who worked on the recent campaign, are also planning to go tonight."This is a broader coalition," said an insider, emphasizing the burgeoning group simply wants a leadership review.

05 December 2007

Does Councillor Lauder Have Any Idea What She Is Doing?

LAUDER CLAIM THAT THE UTRCA MOTION WAS PUT FORTH WITHOUT TIME TO STUDY IT IS CRAP
Connie Lauder claimed in a Sentinel Review article yesterday that she had no idea what she was voting on and that she had no time to study the motion that was before her...so she voted yes, to support the motion even though she had no idea what she was doing.
That's nice!
In Her words...quoted directly from the S-R article by Hugo Rodrigues..
"(The resolution) was put together quickly and everything was push, push, push," Lauder said. "We didn’t have time to do anything or discuss it any further. There was nothing from staff, absolutely nothing."
So, Connie was unable to ask for a deferral because of what?
Nothing. She could have put forth a motion to ask to defer a decision until she had information, but instead, decided to just vote, without any information before her. She didn't even request a discussion on the matter. She forwarded the motion in question, and the balance of the board(overwhelmingly I might add) voted to support the motion. For her to state that she had no idea what she was voting on shows a complete disregard for the process.
This is a lack of due diligence on her part.
Ms Lauder should have informed council that she was in possesion of information that could have had an effect on what decisions council was about to make on the park issue.
Instead, Ms lauder remained silent(the same silence that our mayor used when seated on the Info Energy board) and di not disclose any information to council, which means she witheld this information from the public, on purpose, and for what purpose?
And this makes me wonder how many more decisions she has made on the UTRCA board, or even on city council without studying the actual situation where she just voted because everyone else in the room seemed to be doing the same thing.(and of course, no one wants to seem out of step with the others on the board or council)
So, personally I think that she should have to resign one of her posts.
Obviously she has no idea what she is doing, and she has indicated this with her own words.
It's time for Connie Lauder to take an early leave.

03 December 2007

I Wonder Why This Councillor Didn't Divulge This Information?

COUNCILLOR LAUDER, CAN YOU TELL US WHAT THIS MEANS?

And why wasn't this UTRCA board meeting agenda item not discussed during the November 1, 2007 Woodstock council meeting?
This is odd.
The area that interests us is highlighted in blue below...


September 20, 2007
NOTICE OF
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
DATE: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2007
TIME: 1:30 P.M.
LOCATION: WILDWOOD CONSERVATION AREA
- VISITOR SERVICES CENTRE
AGENDA: 1. Approval of Agenda
2. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest
3. Confirmation of Payment as Required Through Statutory Obligations
4. Minutes of the Previous Meeting
- Tuesday, September 25, 2007
5. Business Arising from the Minutes
6. Committee of the Whole
(a) Property matter related to Tridon Construction
(deferred until November meeting) (Jeff Brick)
7. Business for Approval
(a) Administration and Enforcement - Section 28 Report
Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulations
(M.Snowsell)(Report Attached) (Document #68679)
(b) Interim Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for Prescribed
Areas – Town of Ingersoll (J. Brick) (Report Attached)
(Document #68681)
8. Standing Committees
(a) Joint Health and Safety Committee Minutes
(I.Wilcox)(Report attached)(Document #68319)
9. Presentations
(a) Conservation Services
(B.Glasman)
10. Delegation - None
11. Business for Information
(a) Fanshawe Pioneer Village Update
(S.Johnson)(Verbal)
(b) For Your Information
(To be circulated at meeting)
12. Communications
13. General Manager’s Remarks
14. Chairman’s Remarks and Concluding Comments
15. Other Business
16. Adjournment
The Landowner Recognition Event will follow adjournment.
________________________
Ian Wilcox, General Manager
/ses
c.c. Chair and Members of the Board of Directors
I.Wilcox C.Earl London Free Press
J.Brick C.Machan Stratford Beacon Herald
C.Tasker S.Musclow Woodstock Sentinel Review
B.Glasman B.Mackie
C.Harrington S.Shivas
T.Hollingsworth S.Johnson
M.Snowsell G.Inglis
J.Howley L.Trottier
MINUTES
UTRCA BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2007
P.Huitema, Chair of the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority called the meeting to order at
1:30 p.m., Tuesday, October 23, 2007 in the Wildwood Visitor’s Centre, Wildwood Conservation
Area. The following members and staff were in attendance:
Members: J.Baechler
M.Blackie
J.Boyce
J.Brown
J.Bryant
S.Clark
P.Huitema
E.Hunt
T.Jackson
C.Lauder
G.Marr
D.Mayberry
H.McDermid
M.Wearn
Staff:
J. Brick
J.Enright
B.Glasman
C.Harrington
T.Hollingsworth
S.Johnson
C.Merkley
K.Pugh
A.Shivas
S. Shivas
M. Snowsell
I. Wilcox
Solicitor: Grant Inglis
Regrets: A.Bannister
1. Approval of Agenda
D.Mayberry moved –J.Baechler seconded:-
“RESOLVED that the UTRCA Board of Directors approve
the agenda as circulated.”
CARRIED.
2. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest
P.Huitema inquired whether the members had any conflicts of interest to declare relating to the
agenda. There were none.
3. Confirmation of Payment as Required
Through Statutory Obligations
The Chair inquired whether the Authority has met its statutory obligations in the payment of the
Accounts Payable. The General Manager replied affirmative.
4. Minutes of the Previous Meeting
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
G.Marr moved –J.Boyce seconded:-
“RESOLVED that the Board of Directors’ minutes dated
September 25, 2007 be approved as circulated.”
CARRIED.
5. Business Arising from the Minutes
There was no business arising from the minutes to discuss.
6. Committee of the Whole
(a) There being matters to discuss in the Committee of the Whole.
J.Boyce moved – D.Mayberry seconded:-
“RESOLVED that the UTRCA Board of Directors
adjourn to Committee of the Whole.”
CARRIED.
7. Progress Reported
(a) A property matter relating to Tridon Construction was deferred to the November meeting.
(b) A property matter relating to Burgess Park and Standard Tube lands, Woodstock was
discussed.
C.Lauder moved – J.Boyce seconded:-
“RESOLVED that staff be directed to draft correspondence to
the Chief Administrative Officer, City of Woodstock signed by
the Authority Chair stating that the UTRCA Board of Directors
have not had the opportunity of formally discussing this matter,
the Board would like to review more information and encourages
the City to consult with the Conservation Authority prior to making
a final decision; however the Board is reluctant to consider a
golf course at this time.
CARRIED.
8. Business for Approval
(a) Administration and Enforcement – Section 28
Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulations
(Report attached)(Document #68679)
The attached report was presented to the members for consideration.
G.Marr .Wearn moved – E.Hunt seconded:-
“RESOLVED that the UTRCA Board of Directors
concur with the actions taken by staff as outlined
in the attached report.”
CARRIED.
(b) Interim Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for
Prescribed Areas – Town of Ingersoll
(Report attached)(Document #68681)
J.Brick and M.Snowsell outlined the report for the members’ consideration. Following a lengthy
discussion the motion was amended as follows:
M.Wearn moved – J.Baechler seconded:-
“RESOLVED that Board of Directors approve the Interim
Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for Prescribed Areas in
the Town of Ingersoll, to incorporate the revisions recommended
by the Town of Ingersoll and the Authority Solicitor, as Policy
to guide the staff review of Applications made under Section 28
of the Conservation Authorities Act;
That staff monitor the implementation of the Interim Policy for Erosion
Control Mitigation for Prescribed Areas in the Town of Ingersoll and
report back to the Board of Directors as appropriate;
That unless otherwise directed by the Board of Directors, the Policy
will remain effective for a period of five years from the time of approval.”
CARRIED.
9. Standing Committees
(a) Joint Health and Safety Committee Meeting – September 13, 2007
(Report attached)(Document #68319)
The report was presented for the members’ consideration.
J.Baechler moved –G.Marr seconded:-
“RESOLVED that the UTRCA Board of Directors
approve the recommendations as outlined in the
Joint Health and Safety Committee minutes dated
September 13, 2007.”
CARRIED.
10. Presentations
(a) Conservation Services
B.Glasman, Coordinator of Conservation Services Unit noted that the unit is divided into three
sections, Communities for Nature, Forestry and the Clean Water Program.
B.Glasman and C.Merkley highlighted the Clean Water Program, J.Enright outlined the Forestry
Program and K.Pugh outlined the Communities for Nature Program for the members’ information.
11. Delegations – There were none.
12. Business for Information
(a) Fanshawe Pioneer Village Update
S.Johnson noted the success of the Fanshawe 1812 Re-enactment and Doors Open events held in
September. She advised the members that approximately 2,500 tickets have been sold for the
Haunted Hayrides event scheduled until the end of October. She stated that the capital campaign is
currently at $1.7 million.
She also noted that McCormicks Canada has booked the Village to celebrate its 125th Birthday. The
event will take place in September, 2008 and will be the largest rental event booked to date with
approximately 1,000 visitors.
(b) For Your Information
The report was circulated for the members’ information.
13. Communication
(a) Correspondence from the County of Oxford enclosing a resolution recommending that the
Board of Directors support a 2008 levy requirement increase of not more than a 3% of the 2007 levy
requirement for the County of Oxford.
(b) Correspondence from the Oxford Community Foundation extending an invitation to attend
the premiere event “Celebrate Oxford” scheduled for Tuesday, October 30, 2007. The General
Manager requested the members to contact him if interested in attending.
14. General Manager’s Remarks
I.Wilcox reminded the members that the Budget workshop will be scheduled as discussed at the
previous Board meeting within the next few weeks. The members will be advised of the dates
accordingly, and an attempt will be made not to schedule the workshop on a Monday.
15. Chair’s Remarks and Concluding Comments
P.Huitema noted that he and the General Manager attended a Conservation Ontario Council Meeting
on October 24th in Toronto. He also attended the Climate Change Workshop held at the Four Points
Sheraton, London on October 4, 2007. The Workshop was well attended and very informative.
16. Adjournment
There being no further business to discuss the meeting was adjourned at 2:35 p.m. on a motion by
J.Baechler. Following the adjournment the members participated in the Landowners Recognition
Event at Wildwood Conservation Area.
_____________________________________ ____________________________________
I.Wilcox, General Manager P.Huitema, Chair
/ses
Att.
MEMO
____________________________________________________________________________________
A summary of staff activity related to the Conservation Authority’s Development, Interference of Wetlands
and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ont. Reg. 157/06 under Ontario Regulation
97/04) is presented below. This report covers the period from September 13 to October 10, 2007.
Application # 81/07
City of London
Langarth Street/Emery Street – London
-permission required for rehabilitation of trunk sewer within ravine which outlets into Coves area
-detailed designs prepared by Dillon Consulting Limited
-site meeting conducted to verify scope of work and methodology
-staff approved and permit issued September 21
Application #94/07
Diane Bialek and Joyce Tonner
Part Lot 8, B.F. Concession – Township of South-West Oxford (Beachville)
-approval required for construction of residential dwelling and filling/grading associated with septic
system installation
-various building site location options considered by applicants in consultation with UTRCA
-detailed site plan and grading plan prepared by BOS Engineering & Environmental Services
-staff approved and permit issued September 20
Application #95/07
Fran and Jason Selinger
149 Wilson Avenue – City of London
-proposal to rebuild residential dwelling, located within proposed West London SPA
-detailed plans prepared in accordance with existing interim policies for construction in SPA’s
-staff approved and permit issued October 2
Application #101/07
City of London
Greenway Park – London
-approval required for development of off-leash park and mini soccer pitch within flood plain of
Greenway Park
-site plans prepared and submitted by Parks Planning & Design
-staff approved and permit issued September 14
To: Chair and Members of the UTRCA Board of Directors
From: Jeff Brick, Coordinator – Hydrology & Regulatory Services
Date: October 11, 2007 Agenda #: 7(a)
Subject: Administration and Enforcement – Section 28 Status Report –
Development, Interference of Wetlands and Alteration to
Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation
Filename: ::ODMA\GRPWIS
E\UT_MAIN.UTRC
A_PO.File_Centre_
Library:68679.1
Application #102/07
1610234 Ontario Limited
552 & 556 Wonderland Road – City of London
-permission required for development of self-storage facilities
-redevelopment of property included small portion of flood fringe in close proximity to Wonderland
Road
-detailed site plans prepared by AGM Engineering Ltd.
-staff approved and permit issued September 14
Application #104/07
Stratford House of Blessing
423 Erie Street – City of Stratford
-approval requested for driveway improvements at rear of existing facilities, with storm outlet to
watercourse
-site plans prepared by McNeil Surveying
-staff approved and permit issued September 13 after site meeting to verify scope of work
Application #107/07
Christine and Jimmy Siu
3858 Putnam Road – Thames Centre
-proposal to excavate sediments from portion of existing farm pond
-UTRCA aquatic biologists examined site to confirm scope of work and recommend mitigative
measures
-staff approved and permit issued September 14
Application #109/07
City of London
811 Wilton Grove Road – London
-permit required for site remediation and culvert replacement on small tributary of Dingman Creek
-detailed plans prepared by IBI Group
-staff approved and permit issued September 14
Application #111/07
McCormick Canada
600 Clarke Road – City of London
-proposal to expand shipping area within regulation limit, adjacent to a Pottersburg Creek tributary
-site plans and associated grading details prepared by Dillon Consulting
-staff approved and permit issued September 13
Application #119/07
Brian Morris
36-14 Cadeau Terrace – City of London
-application for construction of small deck extension (deemed “minor works” as per Board-approved
policy)
-staff approved and permit issued September 21
Application #120/07
Skyline Inc.
1223 Richmond Street – City of London
-permit required for construction of front entrance canopy on apartment building
-plans prepared by J. Vincent, P. Eng.
-staff approved and permit issued September 24
Application #122/07
John Bagnall
437 Magnolia Crescent – City of London
-approval required for installation of pool within regulation limit
-site inspection confirmed extent of slope hazard, with pool located beyond slope hazard, within 15
allowance
-staff approved and permit issued October 5
Application # 123/07
Sifton Properties Limited
180 North Centre Road
-proposal to develop second phase of townhouse/condominium project, adjacent to wetland
-detailed site plan, grading/drainage plan and SWM report prepared by Development Engineering
(London) Limited, with provisions for discharge of rooftops to wetland via grassed swales to
maintain pre-development flow to wetland
-staff approved and permit issued October 5
Application #124/07
Wayne Wilson & Kelly Ince
154760 15th Line – Township of Zorra
-approval required for pond excavation within regulation limit
-detailed site plan prepared for property in question, with provision to use excavated material outside
regulation limit
-staff approved and permit issued October 3
Recommended by: Prepared by:
_____________________________ _____________________________
Jeff Brick, Coordinator Mark Snowsell
Hydrology & Regulatory Services Land Use Regulations Officer
MS/ms
MEMO
____________________________________________________________________________________
Recommendation
That the Board of Directors approve the Interim Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for
Prescribed Areas in the Town of Ingersoll as policy to guide the staff review of Applications made
under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act;
That staff be directed to continue to work with the Town of Ingersoll to study the causes and
potential solutions to flooding and erosion in the prescribed areas;
That staff monitor the implementation of the Interim Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for
Prescribed Areas in the Town of Ingersoll and report back to the Board of Directors as appropriate;
That unless otherwise directed by the Board of Directors, the Policy will remain effective for a
period of five years from the time of approval.
Background
In July of 2000, the Upper Thames watershed experienced a storm event that in some locations
matched or exceeded a 1:250-year event. One of the areas affected most seriously was the Town of
Ingersoll. With five significant tributaries draining into the South Thames River (Ingersoll Channel)
within the limits of the municipality, the infrastructure of existing bridges, culverts, roads and
developed properties was particularly vulnerable. Private properties, including several residential
properties were affected by significant flooding and erosion. In the aftermath of the July 2000 event,
Conservation Authority staff undertook an extensive inventory of erosion sites, compiling a record
of more than 170 locations. While many of these sites were undoubtedly experiencing signs of
erosion before the summer of 2000, the magnitude of the problem increased in many locations.
Working in cooperation with the Town of Ingersoll, the UTRCA has also assisted with stormwater
and drainage strategies, including a 2004 stormwater project, undertaken by Dillon Consulting
Limited. That study recommended a series of subsequent initiatives including geomorphology
assessment, flood management and stormwater quality investigations. Based on budget allocations to
date, Ingersoll appears to be committed to undertake these additional studies in an attempt to
develop a comprehensive strategy to address flooding and erosion concerns.
In the meantime, active erosion problems are continuing to put public and private property and
infrastructure at risk. One of the specific areas where residential properties have been affected is a
section of Skye Street which backs onto a tributary locally known as the Sutherland Drain (refer to
the attached Map 1). This area was the focus of recent media attention, with one resident expressing
To: Chair and Members of the UTRCA Board of Directors
From: Jeff Brick, Coordinator – Hydrology & Regulatory Services
Date: October 11, 2007 Agenda # 7 (b)
Subject: Interim Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for
Prescribed Areas in the Town of Ingersoll
Filename: ::ODMA\GRPWISE\UT_
MAIN.UTRCA_PO.File_C
entre_Library:68681.1
frustration at the lack of direction or assistance from the Town or the UTRCA. It has been explained
to this landowner and the Town that the UTRCA does not have access to any provincial or federal
sources of funding to assist with this new urban erosion concern. Our Board Members will be aware
of funding for existing infrastructure to assist with initiatives such as the ongoing West London dyke
rehabilitation project but the Ingersoll situation described herein does not qualify for such funding.
Discussion
It has been suggested that some form of cost-sharing agreement be developed between the Town of
Ingersoll and affected property owners. To date, the UTRCA has offered technical assistance to the
Town and to private property owners in lieu of financial assistance for erosion control project
implementation. With the passing of time, some erosion sites are becoming critical, with the need to
act in the absence of an overall, guiding strategy for stormwater management and erosion control.
Staff are of the opinion that it is reasonable to offer technical assistance to landowners and the
Municipality to help deal with those problem areas where remediation should be undertaken
immediately. All such work will be subject to formal written approval from the UTRCA pursuant to
Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act. Standard requirements for approval will apply, with
the need for applicants to submit satisfactory details of the proposed remedial work. Where possible,
we will provide technical assistance in developing those plans and we will also help to determine
whether other environmental legislation applies. Critical reaches of the Ingersoll tributaries are
highlighted on the attached map. These reaches will in essence form the basis of a special policy
area, to address areas of concern in the absence of the final strategy.
Staff review and decision making for applications in the identified areas where this special policy
approach applies will be guided by the attached Interim Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for
Prescribed Areas, October 2007.
Recommended by: Prepared by:
_____________________________ _____________________________
Jeff Brick, Coordinator Mark Snowsell
Hydrology & Regulatory Services Land Use Regulations Officer
JB/MS/ms
Attachments - Interim Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for Prescribed Areas
in the Town of Ingersoll, October 2007
Map 1
2001 Photographs – Sutherland Drain and Henderson Drain Erosion
Interim Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for Prescribed Areas in the
Town of Ingersoll
October 2007
Background
The Town of Ingersoll is undertaking studies to assess and address broad flooding and erosion issues
in the Town. The study of the causes of the flooding and erosion and the development and
implementation of comprehensive plans to address the problems will take several years. There are
immediate erosion problems that are having significant impacts on a number of properties in a few
specific areas.
Policy
Given the unique situation as described, the UTRCA has determined that a set of special policies for
the review of site specific erosion control mitigation measures is required. The Interim Policy for
Erosion Control Mitigation for Prescribed Areas in the Town of Ingersoll (“the Policy”) shall be
applied to properties in the area identified on the attached Map 1. The Policy allows for the review
and approval of erosion mitigation measures on a site specific basis where the normal approach
would be to require broader reach analysis of projects. The Policy is intended to provide some
protection for the active erosion sites in the interim while broader reach-based planning is
undertaken by the Town of Ingersoll.
Applications for approval under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act for projects where it
is deemed that it is appropriate to apply the policy, will be reviewed with regard for the following
guiding principles:
- The erosion mitigation is restricted to an isolated area;
- The erosion mitigation is proposed to protect against the further loss of property or to protect
against damage to property due to erosion from the adjacent watercourse;
- Potential environmental impacts from the proposed measures are avoided or mitigated;
- Approval of a project under this Policy does not limit or replace the need for other applicable
approvals;
- The measures that are proposed are understood to be interim in nature and given this, the
engineering design may be less rigorous than what would be required under normal
circumstances. The engineering design must still be deemed to meet minimum engineering
standards and have regard for geomorphological processes;
- Notwithstanding the previous clause, the UTRCA reserves the right to require more rigorous
engineering design due to the conditions of a site, the nature of the proposed measure or the
potential risk to private property, public property or the environment;
- Depending on the availability of UTRCA technical staff resources, technical design
assistance may be provided by the UTRCA to assist landowners with identifying the cause of
problems at their site and to identify interim measures to address the problems.
- Technical assistance by the Conservation Authority is provided in good faith and landowners
will be encouraged to obtain independent professional advice – at their expense and
applicants must execute a Release and Indemnity document (details outlined below).
Approvals granted under this Policy are subject to the following standard conditions:
- The UTRCA approval will explicitly indicate that the project is approved under the Interim
Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for Prescribed Areas in the Town of Ingersoll
- Landowner must execute a Release and Indemnity document (sample provided below) that
includes the following:
o Acknowledges that the approval is granted under the Policy;
o Acknowledges the interim nature of the works
This policy is subject to review and monitoring and may be revised or revoked by the UTRCA
Board of Directors. Unless otherwise revised or extended, this policy is valid until October
2012.
RELEASE AND INDEMNITY
Given in Connection with Section 28 Permit Application # ___________
In accordance with the Town of Ingersoll Interim Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for Prescribed Areas, Approved by the
UTRCA October 2007.
IN CONSIDERATION for the issuance of the permit in connection with the above Application, the undersigned Applicant, for
itself, himself, herself, his/her heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, hereby releases and forever discharges
the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, its officers, directors, servants, agents and employees (the “Authority”) and
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario of and from all actions, causes of action, suits, debts, duties,
covenants, claims and demands whatsoever which the undersigned now has or hereafter can, shall or may have for or by
reason of or in any way arising out of any claim for loss, damage, injury or otherwise caused by or arising out of the flooding
or erosion of the land described as:
Legally:
Municipally:
Whether the same is caused by natural forces alone or a combination of natural forces and the operation of flood control dams,
devices or structures by the Authority and/or Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario and further the
undersigned agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Authority and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of
Ontario by any other party arising out of the permission granted by the Authority to the undersigned with respect to the
completion of interim erosion control works on the said lands above described.
THIS RELEASE AND INDEMNITY shall endure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto, their respective
heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns.
Dated at Ingersoll this ___________ day of ____________, 2007.
______________________
Applicant
Sutherland Drain – Skye Street, Ingersoll
Henderson Drain – Ingersoll
JOINT HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING
MINUTES
Wednesday, September 13, 2007
B. Glasman called the JH&SC meeting to order at _10:00__a.m. at the UTRCA Fanshawe Admin.
Building.
Members Present: B. Glasman D. Schofield
E. Stockmann B. Williamson
Minutes: C. Ramsey
Guests: S. Viglianti
Agenda: Accepted by B. Williamson Seconded by E. Stockmann
1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting: June 13, 2007
Motion : ___E. Stockmann__________ Seconded: B. Williamson ________________
“RESOLVED that the Minutes of the JH&SC meeting dated June 13, 2007 be approved.”
CARRIED.
2. Business Arising from the Minutes:
a) Eye Wash Stations – E. Stockmann reported that the deluge shower has been installed at
the Fanshawe workshop and that the eye wash fountains at Pittock and Wildwood have
been installed. The eye wash fountain has not been installed at Fanshawe yet.
Action item: Brad to discuss portable eyewash stations at the dams with coordinators
c) Lockout Policy – Eric gave an update on lock-out training. Some units have not been
trained and if Eric can not get to the unit meetings before, there is a possibility of doing
the training after the watershed management meeting in December.
Action item: Eric to send out an e-mail reminder to coordinators to find out when
their next unit meetings are. An option may be after the
Watershed Management Division meeting on Dec 6/07. .
3. New Business:
a) Workplace Inspections
Inspections took place at the following Conservation Areas:
• Fanshawe C. A. – Administration Building
On June 29, 2007 the following structures were inspected: Administration office, north end
dam offices, conservation services portable, ESA/Parks portable (Brandon Williamson)
• Admin. Building upper floor – no hazards
• Admin. Building lower floor – no hazards
• North end dam offices – no hazards
• ESA/parks portable – no hazards
• Conservation services portable – emergency lights not working
On July 26 and 30, 2007 the following structures were inspected: Administration office,
north end dam offices, conservation services portable, ESA/Parks portable (Brandon
Williamson)
• Admin. Building upper floor – no hazards
• North end dam offices – no hazards
• Admin. Building lower floor – emergency lights in the boiler room not
working
• ESA/parks portable – no hazards
• Conservation services portable – no hazards
On August 29, 2007 the following structures were inspected: Administration office, north
end dam offices, conservation services portable, ESA/Parks portable (Brandon Williamson)
• Admin. Building upper floor – no hazards
• Admin. Building lower floor – no hazards
• North end dam offices – no hazards
• ESA/parks portable – no hazards
• Conservation services portable – no hazards
• Fanshawe C.A./ Parks
On August 26, 2007 the following structures were inspected: Campground and Day Use
Area – buildings, washrooms, pavilions, pumphouses (Damian Schofield and Steve
Musclow)
• D washroom – no hazards
• B washroom – no hazards
• A washroom – 1 light tube missing, 4th shower missing handle, 4th toilet from
end – toilet paper holder broken
• E washroom – bag of powder on floor with no label
• Laundromat – no hazards
• Pool shed – eye wash container broken
• Rechlorination building – no hazards
• F3 pumphouse – no hazards
• F5 pumphouse – loose plywood board hanging in ceiling
• UV building – no hazards – closed for season
• Beach pavilion – bulb out in emergency lights, drain pipe on south end patio
• door broken loose, wasp nest in the credit card slot in payphone
• Quad washroom – NW washroom has loose metal plate behind toilet
• Watson Porter pavilion – no hazards
• Front gate – emergency light out over door
• Lunchroom/ kitchen area – no hazards
• Stock room – electrical panel blocked, general housekeeping
• Gator bay – no hazards
• Park office/ registration – no hazards
• Pittock C.A.
* On July 26, 2007 the following structures were inspected: Pumphouses and bathrooms
(Laura Cobb, Bill Austin)
• Pumphouse #4 – fire extinguisher over charged
• Pumphouse #1 – no hazards
• Pumphouse #2 – no hazards
• Pumphouse #3 – no hazards
• Day use bathroom – no hazards
• 1st bathroom – light out in woman’s side, light out on men’s side pathway
• 3rd bathroom – no workplace labels on cleaners
• 4th bathroom – no hazards
• 2nd bathroom – light out on men’s side
• Wildwood C.A
* On August 2, 2007 the following structures were inspected: all applicable buildings (Craig
Machan, Diana Wasmund)
• Office – no hazards
• Gas shed – WHMIS label missing on 3 gas cans
• Workshop – 2 lights out, missing WHMIS label, unknown substance
• Driveshed – no hazards
• Visitor Centre – unstable book shelf, loose hose – trip hazard, corroded
batteries
• Gatehouse – light out
• Washroom C – hose trip hazard, improper chemical storage
• Pool – no hazards
• Beach washroom – improper chemical storage
• Marina – no hazards
• Thomas Orr Dam
* On September 11, 2007 the following structure was inspected: Thomas Orr Dam (Eric
Stockmann, Stewart Cahill)
• Operations building – fire extinguisher hasn’t been inspected since May 2005
• Deck – no hazards
• Mitchell Dam
* On September 11, 2007 the following structure was inspected: Mitchell Dam (Eric Stockmann,
Stewart Cahill)
• Operations building – fire extinguisher hasn’t been inspected since March
2005, MSDS sheet for “Krak” is missing, no records of testing emergency
lights
• Deck – no hazards
• Pittock Dam
* On August 30, 2007 the following structure was inspected: Pittock Dam (Eric Stockmann,
Stewart Cahill)
• Operations building – lights burnt out on second level and in tunnel, no
records of testing emergency lights
• Control Building/ Generator building – emergency exit lights burnt out/ no
records of testing, lights burnt out in control room, guard used ot prevent
access to the generator fan and belts does not completely prevent access,
generator exhaust is not guarded
b) First-Aid / Accident Reports:
• Wasp stings to upper body, neck, hand, forearm, biceps
• Wasp stings to left side of forehead
• Sprained ankle
• Bee sting to left eye
c) Workplace Procedures for Approval
• no procedures were brought forward for approval
Health and Safety Specialist Update
C. Ramsey gave an update on the fall arrest equipment training course to see if anyone was
interested. She commented that she will be pursuing her professional (Canadian Registered
Safety Professional) designation in 2008 and that she had been invited to attend an IAPA
networking session later that day. C. Ramsey discussed the issue that no smoking signs need
to be placed in all vehicles. The committee discussed whether having Benadryl or other
medication available to staff is appropriate since we seem to have a high number of multiple
wasp stings this year. The committee discussed it and decided to bring it up to the
coordinators.
Action item: B. Glasman will bring the medication discussion to coordinators
Action item: C. Ramsey to do research into wasps, see if there is any information for
staff such as preparedness posters
Action item: Motor Pool staff to install “no smoking” signs in all UTRCA vehicles
d) Coordinator Update
B. Glasman commented that his 2 year term as JH&SC Management Co-chair is up in
December and that Chris Harrington, Coordinator Research and Planning will replace him on
the JH&SC.
4. Other Business:
E. Stockmann discussed replacement of the fuel tank at Wildwood and that upon further
inspection by the TSSA, the tank is still too close to the building and it needs to be moved 12
inches. This will be completed in the fall as soon as the fuel level in the tank permits moving
it. E. Stockmann has received his Licensed Site Operator certification and can now perform
minor maintenance and proper fuel inventory record keeping on behalf of the Authority.
5. Next Meeting:
The next meeting has been scheduled for October 24, 2007, at the Fanshawe at 9:00 a.m.
6. Adjournment: 11:05a.m.
_____________________________
E. Stockmann, Worker Co-Chair B. Glasman, Management Co-Chair
1
FYI OCTOBER 2007
519-451-2800 www.thamesriver.on.ca
Trailing through the Swamp
The Friends of Ellice and Gads Hill Swamps, the Rotary Club
of Stratford, and the UTRCA have teamed together to pursue the
idea of a hiking trail at Ellice Swamp. The Rotary Club of Stratford
has offered to find funding for the project, while the UTRCA and
the Friend’s Committee are researching a possible location and
access for the trail.
The best option for the trail follows the abandoned rail bed on
UTRCA property. This portion of the rail bed was purchased by
the Stratford Field Naturalists and donated to the UTRCA. The
6 km trail would take hikers through marsh, swamp thicket, and
wooded swamp. The open marsh area is an excellent area for bird
watching.
Contact: Steve Sauder, ext. 275
Communities for Nature
A busy fall tree planting program is anticipated starting October
13 and continuing during the first two weeks of November. Projects
will be completed in St. Julien Park, Stoney Creek and Westminster
Ponds in London, on two Dingman Creek properties, on one
Oxbow Creek property, in Woodstock’s Burgess Park, at Ingersoll’s
Smith’s Pond, in Dorchester’s Scout camp on Hamiliton Road,
at South Perth Centennial School, and along Stratford’s Waldie
Drain. Approximately 1500 students will participate.
Contact: Karen Pugh, ext 252.
Another Season Has Come and Gone!
Our campgrounds and day use areas closed on Sunday, October
14 for another year. We were fortunate enough to have Mother
Nature on our side right up until the end! Thanksgiving weekend
was beautiful and many took advantage of the sunshine to visit
our parks one last time before the cool fall air moved in.
Staff will spend the next few weeks shutting down the operations,
which includes tasks such as draining water lines, winterizing
facilities, and cleaning up campsites. Seasonal staff will finish
their work terms with us by the end of the month. We couldn’t
have done it without such a dedicated group of people.
Fall and winter work plans are under way with emphasis being
placed on hazard tree management in all three Conservation Areas.
Drinking water systems training and 2008 budget development
will also be a focus for staff, not to mention taking some well
deserved holidays.
It won’t be long until we are changing our signs to welcome our
campers and visitors again in 2008.
Contact: Jennifer Howley, ext. 265
Memorial Forest Dedications
Over 200 people attended the annual George Furtney
Memorial Forest dedication service at Fanshawe CA on Sunday,
September 30. In addition to local visitors, people came from
Kincardine, Toronto, Sarnia, Mississauga, Alymer, Goderich,
and Newmarket.
There were many favourable comments on the park itself and
the beautiful setting for such an occasion. Judy Bryant brought
greetings from the City of London, Karen Pugh spoke on behalf
of the UTRCA, and Dave Pizzey represented the Logan and Evans
Funeral Home. Thanks also go to the Fanshawe CA staff who work
hard on pre-event details to ensure the day runs smoothly.
Jane Boyce, UTRCA Board Member and Chair of the Friends of Ellice
and Gads Hill Swamp, Tara Tchir, UTRCA Ecologist, and Bill Mackie,
UTRCA Superintendent of Support Services and Properties, review
trail options.
2
The City of Woodstock Memorial Forest dedication service
also took place on September 30. Thanks go to Councillor Connie
Lauder for representing the UTRCA at this event at Pittock CA,
which was attended by 75 people. Some people come to this
service every year to take part. Thank you to the Pittock staff who
ensure the preparation work is always well done, and to the staff
of R.D. Longworth Funeral Home.
Contact: Karen Pugh, ext. 252
Joining the Show
The UTRCA had a display and information at the 14th Annual
Outdoor Farm Show in Woodstock, September 11-13. The show
was promoted as the fall focal point for commercial farm families to
access new technology in a professional outdoor environment.
Staff met landowners to promote the Clean Water Program,
the 60th Anniversary of the UTRCA, and Drinking Water Source
Protection. Staff also helped with plastic mulch demonstrations
(see article elsewhere) and guiding walks on the Heritage Trail.
Contact: Steve Sauder, ext. 275
Another Benchmark
Two new Rotary Club of London West benches were installed
near the trail entrance of Westminster Ponds/Pond Mills
Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) at the Wellington Road
Tourist Information Centre. The benches are part of the following
trail development projects at this ESA:
• wheelchair accessible boardwalk to view Saunders Pond,
• entrance kiosks with information about the ESA,
• trail system with walking loops around Saunders Pond and
Spettigue Pond,
• side trail to the recently designated Dr. Saunders Cabin Site.
The Rotary Club of London West has been a major partner
of Westminster Ponds/Pond Mills ESA for many years. On
Sunday, October 14, the new viewing benches were dedicated in
recognition of the efforts of two Rotarians, Past President Norm
West and Past District Governor Gord Campbell, who worked to
help preserve this environmentally significant area.
Trail redevelopment at Westminster Ponds/Pond Mills ESA was
the largest issue during the development of the new master plan
for this area. More than 80 recommendations for the protection
and enhancement of this natural jewel are being followed to
improve access for people while continuing to protect the area’s
ecological integrity.
Westminster Ponds/Pond Mills ESA is owned and managed by
the City of London and the UTRCA. The ESA is approximately
240 hectares in size and is a Provincially Significant Wetland. More
than 750 species of plants, 230 species of birds, and 20 species of
mammals have been identified in this ESA.
Contact: Steve Sauder, ext. 276
Doors Open Sifton Bog
Doors Open London gives citizens of London and the
surrounding area an opportunity to visit heritage sites in London.
This year the doors were open at more than 50 sites in London on
the weekend of September 22 & 23.
More than 700 people visited Sifton Bog ESA during the
Doors Open weekend. UTRCA staff and members of the Sifton
Bog Master Plan Local Advisory Committee greeted visitors and
introduced them to the unique forms of life found in the bog.
Some of the highlights included seeing Pitcher Plant and Cotton
Grass, viewing Painted Turtles through spotting scopes, and using
dip nets to find bugs in Redmond’s Pond. Staff also explained plans
for the future based upon the draft master plan for Sifton Bog.
Contact: Steve Sauder, ext. 276
Rotarian Ken Wilmot presents the dedication plaques for the new
benches at Westminster Ponds.
Visitors viewed Redmond’s Pond from the floating platform.
The UTRCA’s Brenda Gallagher converses with a local landowner at
the Outdoor Farm Show.
3
Grub for Grubs
At a recent Conservation Services meeting in Toronto,
information on a new threat to reforestation efforts was brought to
the forefront. White grubs (specifically Japanese beetle, European
chafer and June beetle) have been hindering reforestation efforts
by the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority. These grubs
are the same species that we find in our lawns causing problems
with the grass. The grubs eat the fine root hairs of trees, killing
the tree. The susceptible tree species are White Pine, Fraser Fir,
Red Pine, Norway Spruce, White Spruce, Tamarack, European
Larch and White Cedar. Established trees over 2 metres tall and
hardwood species are more resilient to white grubs.
Signs of infestation include lack of ground cover and bare
patches of soil. A heavy infestation would have more than 25
grubs per square metre. A tree that has died due to grubs will have
almost no root system when it is dug up.
At this time there are
no sites in the Upper
Thames watershed
known to be affected
by white grubs.
Contact: Jay Ebel,
ext. 242
Horses in the sugar bush
The Fanshawe Sugar Bush will be horse logged in mid
November. The bush was marked to provincial standards in
July and the sap lines and taps were removed by the Kinsmen in
August. The Kinsmen operate the Sugar Bush in partnership with
the UTRCA, and produce maple products on site.
Art Shannon, who has done horse logging for the UTRCA
before, will use his team to log the bush. Logging with horses
minimizes the impact on the surrounding vegetation. The sugar
bush has not been actively managed in many years and is in need
of thinning in order to improve the quality of the trees there. The
total area to be logged is approximately 11 acres.
Contact: Jay Ebel, ext. 242
Corridor Plan Approved
On September 10, the City of London Planning Committee
approved the Phase I Thames Valley Corridor Plan Report. UTRCA
staff prepared the document and chaired the Corridor Advisory
Committee for Phase I. The results of this phase include:
• compiled background information,
• mapped corridor limits for the London Thames valley,
• a vision for the future.
P h a s e I I w i l l
i n c l u d e t h e
development of policy
recommendations for
the City of London
O ffi c i a l P l a n . A
large component
o f c o m m u n i t y
consultation will be
included in Phase II.
Contact: Steve
Sauder, ext. 275
Two Tree initiatives come together
Over the past two years the UTRCA has been experimenting
with direct seeding as an alternative to planting seedlings, and
planting seedlings in plastic mulch as an alternative to using
herbicides. In 2007 we decided to merge the two techniques by
planting tree seed directly into plastic mulch. After the first growing
season the results look very promising.
Horses were used to log the UTRCA Montain property in 2003.
Above: White grubs next
to a pen for scale.
Left: Grubs have eaten
the fine roots of this
newly planted seedling.
(Photos courtesy
Nottawasaga Valley
Conservation Authority)
The Thames
valley corridor in
London, just west of
Wonderland Road.
4
In May, two strips of plastic mulch were laid at the Woodstock
Outdoor Farm Show agroforestry demonstration area. Slits were
cut into the plastic mulch and five red oak acorns planted in each
slit. Five acorns were used to ensure seed germination at each
location. The slits were then held open using a 15 cm steel staple.
Seed germination was excellent in all but one each location,
germinating anywhere from one to five seedlings.
At some point in the future the most dominant seedling will be
selected and the others clipped, leaving one tree per plant location.
The black plastic mulch holds soil moisture, warms the soil and
provides vegetation control, all of which are added benefits in
growing tree seedlings. The warm, moist soil probably accounts
for the very rapid, uniform germination that was experienced this
year. This fall we laid three additional strips of plastic mulch and
plan to experiment with other species such as black cherry, burr
oak and bitternut hickory.
Contact: John Enright, ext. 243
Lots to talk about
On October 10 and 11, Chris Earl, Steven Musclow, Damian
Schofield and Craig Machan attended a conservation areas
workshop entitled “Providing Greenspace on a Shoestring.” The
event was hosted by the Land Management Committee of the
Greater Golden Horseshoe General Managers Committee, in
conjunction with the Provincial Working Group on Conservation
Areas.
The two day workshop included sessions on business in
conservation areas, risk management, enforcement issues, customer
service and fleet management. The workshop also provided staff
with an opportunity to network and build relationships with staff
from other Conservation Authorities.
The workshop was a great success, with approximately 90 people
from across Ontario. UTRCA staff found it very informative and
relevant to the issues faced by Conservation Area Superintendents
and their staff.
Contact: Craig Machan, 519-284-2931 ext. 425
Special Events Wrap up
It was a busy year for special events at our three Conservation
Areas. Our event schedule began prior to the parks opening in early
April and will continue late into October after the parks close. We
had many repeat events in 2007, such as fireworks displays, a Civil
War re-enactment, fishing derbies, dragon boat festivals, trail runs,
and cross country runs.
A new event that took place at Fanshawe Conservation Area
and Fanshawe Pioneer Village was “Fanshawe 1812: The Invasion
of Upper Canada.” Fanshawe CA staff worked very closely with
Pioneer Village staff to make this event a huge success, attended
by hundreds of spectators.
Contact: Michelle McDonald, ext. 279
Top: Laying the plastic mulch.
Bottom: Success! Oak seedlings begin their reach for the sky.
Top: The Civil War Re-enactment at Wildwood CA is a popular event.
Bottom: Dragon boat festivals were held at Pittock and Fanshawe.
5
Greening Camp Bel
Approximately 25 local Guides (under the leadership of UTRCA’s
Karen Mortimer), Cubs and Scouts planted 156 new conifer trees
at Camp Bel in Dorchester on Saturday, October 13.
In 1988, Bert Elgin Langford allowed the use of his 60 acre farm
for scouting activities. When he passed away in 1990, he left his
property to the Ontario Boy Scouts of Canada. The property was
named with his initials.
White spruce, white pine and Colorado blue spruce were planted.
The trees will act as a buffer to help improve water quality (the
camp is close to the Thames River and to the Dorchester Swamp,
a Provincially Significant Wetland), will create wildlife habitat and
nesting opportunities, and will provide a visual and sound barrier
to the neighbouring houses and future development.
The project was funded by the TD Friends of the Environment
Foundation and the Middlesex Stewardship Council.
Contact Karen Pugh, ext. 252
Creating a Climate for Change
On Thursday, October 4, the UTRCA hosted the “Creating a
Climate for Change in the Upper Thames Watershed” workshop at
the Four Points Sheraton in London. The workshop attracted 130
participants and represented the final phase of a project designed
to examine the effects of climate change on flooding and drought
in the upper Thames River watershed.
The workshop agenda was developed to appeal to both
participants interested in the details of the hydrologic and socioeconomic
models, and those interested in learning about initiatives
being undertaken locally and in other areas of Southwestern
Ontario.
Partners in presenting the workshop included researchers from
the University of Western Ontario’s Institute for Catastrophic Loss
Reduction, the University of Waterloo, and Environment Canada.
In addition, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the
Clean Air Partnership, the City of London and author Leslie Garrett
all provided thoughtful and motivating presentations. Participants
were treated to an after dinner presentation entitled “No Going
Back: The Science of a Warmer World” by Dr. David Pearson,
Professor of Earth Sciences at Laurentian University and Project
Director for Science North.
The TD Friends of the Environment Foundation provided
support to present the workshop and to cover the cost of producing
proceedings.
Contact: Teresa Hollingsworth, ext. 226
Recognizing Former Landowners of
Wildwood Lands
The UTRCA will be recognizing former landowners of what is
now Wildwood Conservation Area on Tuesday, October 23. A new
sign recognizing these former landowners’ contribution to flood
protection will be unveiled as part of the event. The UTRCA Board
of Directors and representatives of the former property owners’
families will be involved in unveiling the sign.
The UTRCA is pleased to recognize the contributions of the
former property owners of Wildwood Conservation Area lands
as part of the Conservation Authority’s 60th anniversary. This
year also marks the 40th anniversary of the official opening of
Wildwood Dam.
The construction of Wildwood Dam and Reservoir as a flood
control structure and summer flow augmentation system was
seen as a priority when the UTRCA was formed in 1947. In
1948, the authority named the projected dam and conservation
area as Wildwood after the post office that was once located
there. It was anticipated that the dam would also create a large
outdoor recreation area for camping, boating and other outdoor
activities.
The project was shelved in 1948 due to the fact that people in the
Wildwood area were not sure that they wanted it. There was also
concern that this was something new in the Province of Ontario
and there were no precedents to judge the idea against, and the
municipalities had differences in opinion about the cost sharing
of this project.
The project was revived in 1956 when the provincial government
increased funding to 50% for capital projects. The UTRCA was
seeking an additional 25% funding from the federal government
for the construction of the dam. After considerable negotiation, all
funding was in place by 1960. A meeting was held in September
1961 with the UTRCA and municipalities affected by the project.
All municipalities approved the project and the closing and
relocation of roads was discussed at the meeting.
6
In December 1961, the UTRCA met with property owners
to outline the land acquisition procedures. Each property was
assessed separately by three independent appraisers. From these
appraisals, the appraisers came forward with fair market value. The
property owners were also given an additional 10% for forceful
taking. All properties were offered an additional bonus per acre if
arbitration was not required. Only one property was involved in
significant litigation. The 37 former property owners owned about
3,000 acres of land at Wildwood Conservation Area.
The sod-turning ceremony for Wildwood Dam took place on
June 4, 1963. The final inspection of the completed project took
place on November 23, 1965 and the official opening of the
Wildwood Dam took place on June 15, 1967. The total cost of
the project was $3,118,949.
The UTRCA is pleased to recognize the 37 former property
owners and their families for their significant contribution to
conservation in the upper Thames watershed. The UTRCA also
wishes to thank Ron Lang of Ottawa for his help in contacting
former landowners.
Contact: Steve Sauder, ext. 275
Top: Construction of the Wildwood Dam on Trout Creek.
Bottom: A recent aerial view of Wildwood Conservation Area, with the
dam at the top right.
On the Agenda
The following items will be presented at the UTRCA Board
of Directors’ meeting on October 23rd, 2007. Board meeting
minutes are posted on the Downloads section our website, at www.
thamesriver.on.ca.
• Administration and Enforcement - Section 28 Report (Fill,
Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulations)
• Interim Policy for Erosion Control Mitigation for Prescribed
Areas – Town of Ingersoll
• Conservation Services Presentation
Contact: Susan Shivas, ext. 222